Stephen L. Isaacs
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Health top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Steven A. SchroederLynn P. FreedmanDiane E. MeierRobert HughesJames R. KnickmanJohn A. RossLewis G. SandyRisa Lavizzo‐Mourey
- Topics
- Healthcare Policy and Management (7 papers)Primary Care and Health Outcomes (4 papers)Global Maternal and Child Health (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Stephen L. Isaacs
20 papers receiving 594 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
- General Health Professions 347
- Economics and Econometrics 170
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 138
- Health 100
- Sociology and Political Science 89
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen L. Isaacs
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen L. Isaacs's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen L. Isaacs with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen L. Isaacs more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen L. Isaacs
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen L. Isaacs. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen L. Isaacs. The network helps show where Stephen L. Isaacs may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen L. Isaacs
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen L. Isaacs. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen L. Isaacs based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen L. Isaacs. Stephen L. Isaacs is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 50 | |
| 2 | 39 | |
| 3 | 52 | |
| 4 | School health services and programs | 5 |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | Generalist medicine and the U.S. health system | 3 |
| 7 | 277 | |
| 8 | Foundations and health reform: meeting the challenge. | 1 |
| 9 | To Improve Health and Health Care 1997: The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Anthology | 9 |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 11 | |
| 12 | 80 | |
| 13 | 8 | |
| 14 | 64 | |
| 15 | 7 | |
| 16 | 10 | |
| 17 | 28 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | Induced abortion in Latin America: the legal perspective | 3 |
About Stephen L. Isaacs
Stephen L. Isaacs is a scholar working on Issues, ethics and legal aspects, General Health Professions and Gender Studies, having authored 22 papers that have together received 669 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Healthcare Policy and Management (7 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (4 papers) and Global Maternal and Child Health (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (347 citations), Health (100 citations) and Gender Studies (68 citations). Stephen L. Isaacs has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Steven A. Schroeder, Lynn P. Freedman, Diane E. Meier, Robert Hughes, James R. Knickman, Steven A. Schroeder, John A. Ross, Lewis G. Sandy, Risa Lavizzo‐Mourey and Willine Carr. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, Health Affairs and Population and Development Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.