Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Case For More Active Policy Attention To Health Promotion
2002827 citationsJames R. Knickman et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by James R. Knickman
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of James R. Knickman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James R. Knickman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James R. Knickman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James R. Knickman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James R. Knickman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James R. Knickman. The network helps show where James R. Knickman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James R. Knickman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James R. Knickman.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James R. Knickman based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with James R. Knickman. James R. Knickman is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
McCall, Nelda, et al.. (1998). Factors important in the purchase of partnership long-term care insurance.. PubMed. 33(2 Pt 1). 187–203.34 indexed citations
Ward, David M., et al.. (1994). RUG-II Impacts on Long-Term Care Facilities in New York. PubMed Central. 16(2). 85.3 indexed citations
10.
Finkler, Steven A., et al.. (1994). Innovation in nursing: a benefit/cost analysis.. PubMed. 12(1). 18–27.5 indexed citations
11.
Ward, David M., et al.. (1994). RUG-II (Resource Utilization Group, Version II) impacts on long-term care facilities in New York.. PubMed. 16(2). 85–99.3 indexed citations
12.
Finkler, Steven A., et al.. (1993). A comparison of work-sampling and time-and-motion techniques for studies in health services research.. PubMed. 28(5). 577–97.103 indexed citations
13.
Kovner, Christine, et al.. (1993). Changing the Delivery of Nursing Care. JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration. 23(11). 24–34.15 indexed citations
14.
Knickman, James R., et al.. (1992). AIDS and long-term care: The use of services in an institutional setting. 7(1). 32–41.3 indexed citations
Weitzman, Beth C., James R. Knickman, & Marybeth Shinn. (1990). Pathways to homelessness. Journal of Social Issues. 46(4). 125–139.12 indexed citations
19.
Knickman, James R. & Beth C. Weitzman. (1989). A study of homeless families in New York City: Characteristics and comparisons with other public assistance families (final report, volume 2).1 indexed citations
20.
Anderson, Gerard F. & James R. Knickman. (1984). Adverse selection under a voucher system: grouping Medicare recipients by level of expenditure.. PubMed. 21(2). 135–43.16 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.