Lydia A. Isaac
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Health top 5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Thomas A. LaVeistKaren Patricia WilliamsDwayne T. BrandonDarrell J. GaskinNancy BreenPatrick RichardA. C. AndersonEliseo J. Pérez‐Stable
- Topics
- Global Health Workforce Issues (3 papers)Healthcare Policy and Management (2 papers)Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Lydia A. Isaac
6 papers receiving 876 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
- General Health Professions 380
- Sociology and Political Science 234
- Health 196
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 181
- Clinical Psychology 132
Countries citing papers authored by Lydia A. Isaac
This map shows the geographic impact of Lydia A. Isaac's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lydia A. Isaac with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lydia A. Isaac more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lydia A. Isaac
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lydia A. Isaac. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lydia A. Isaac. The network helps show where Lydia A. Isaac may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lydia A. Isaac
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lydia A. Isaac. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lydia A. Isaac based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lydia A. Isaac. Lydia A. Isaac is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Economic Burden of Racial, Ethnic, and Educational Health Inequities in the USbreakdown → | 123 |
| 2 | Race, ethnicity, and health: a public health reader. | 102 |
| 3 | Defining health and health care disparities and examining disparities across the life span. | 8 |
| 4 | 11 | |
| 5 | Mistrust of Health Care Organizations Is Associated with Underutilization of Health Servicesbreakdown → | 419 |
| 6 | 255 |
About Lydia A. Isaac
Lydia A. Isaac is a scholar working on Emergency Medical Services, Health and Pharmacy, having authored 6 papers that have together received 918 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Health Workforce Issues (3 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (2 papers) and Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health (196 citations), General Health Professions (380 citations) and Transplantation (18 citations). Lydia A. Isaac has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Thomas A. LaVeist, Karen Patricia Williams, Dwayne T. Brandon, Darrell J. Gaskin, Nancy Breen, Patrick Richard, A. C. Anderson, Eliseo J. Pérez‐Stable, Tilda Farhat and Lynn Roberts. Their work appears in journals such as JAMA, Health Services Research and North Carolina Medical Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.