Stephen J. Bahr
- Sociology and Political Science top 0.5%
- Clinical Psychology top 1%
- General Health Professions top 1%
- Epidemiology top 5%
- Demography top 0.5%
- Co-authors
- John P. HoffmannRobert E. EmeryAnastasios C. MarcosYang Xiao-yanSuzanne L. MaughanA. MarcosRolley E. JohnsonRichard E. Johnson
- Topics
- Family Dynamics and Relationships (21 papers)Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (14 papers)Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (12 papers)
- Cited by
- DemographyHealthClinical Psychology
- Partner nations
- United StatesGreeceUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Stephen J. Bahr
74 papers receiving 3.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
- Sociology and Political Science 1.8k
- Clinical Psychology 1.2k
- General Health Professions 829
- Epidemiology 814
- Demography 767
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen J. Bahr
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen J. Bahr's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen J. Bahr with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen J. Bahr more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen J. Bahr
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen J. Bahr. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen J. Bahr. The network helps show where Stephen J. Bahr may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen J. Bahr
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen J. Bahr. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen J. Bahr based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen J. Bahr. Stephen J. Bahr is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 13 | |
| 2 | 73 | |
| 3 | 84 | |
| 4 | 17 | |
| 5 | 103 | |
| 6 | 13 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | Family research : a sixty-year review, 1930-1990 | 33 |
| 9 | 58 | |
| 10 | 26 | |
| 11 | 69 | |
| 12 | 187 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 33 | |
| 16 | 12 | |
| 17 | 9 | |
| 18 | 24 | |
| 19 | 73 | |
| 20 | 5 |
About Stephen J. Bahr
Stephen J. Bahr is a scholar working on Demography, Gender Studies and Clinical Psychology, having authored 76 papers that have together received 3.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Family Dynamics and Relationships (21 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (14 papers) and Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Demography (767 citations), Health (536 citations) and Clinical Psychology (1.2k citations). Stephen J. Bahr has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Greece and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include John P. Hoffmann, Robert E. Emery, Anastasios C. Marcos, Yang Xiao-yan, Suzanne L. Maughan, A. Marcos, Rolley E. Johnson, Richard E. Johnson, Acheampong Yaw Amoateng and Boyd C. Rollins. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, Social Forces and Journal of Marriage and the Family.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.