Stephen Hills

17 papers receiving 269 citations

Peers

Stephen Hills
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Modeling and Simulation 44
  • Gender Studies 56
  • Applied Psychology 30
  • Health 35
  • Clinical Psychology 82
Replace Harley Williamson with:
Harley Williamson Australia
Marina Fikel Germany
Michelle Hayes Australia
Sedat Bostan Türkiye
Siyue Li United States
Hualei Yang China
Dennis Martell United States
Karen Middleton United Kingdom
Daniel Graeber Germany
Ridwan Islam Sifat Bangladesh
Stephen Hills relative to Harley Williamson Australia Harley Williamson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Harley Williamson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Hills

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Hills's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Hills with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Hills more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Hills

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Hills. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Hills. The network helps show where Stephen Hills may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Hills, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Hills Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Hills links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 2021107
2 201845
3 201543
4 202116
5
Sport as an analogy to teach life skills and redefine moral values: a case study of the ‘Seedbeds of Peace’ sport-for-development programme in Medellin, Colombia
201814
6 201813
7 20219
8 20157
9 19995
10 20223
11
Social program evaluations: strategies and shared value
20173
12 20023
13 20193
14 20172
15 20251
16 20181
17 20131

About Stephen Hills

Stephen Hills is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, Safety Research, Gender Studies and Social Psychology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 276 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sport and Mega-Event Impacts (5 papers), Sports, Gender, and Society (4 papers), Youth Development and Social Support (4 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (4 papers), Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (2 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers), Sports Analytics and Performance (2 papers) and COVID-19 epidemiological studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Modeling and Simulation (44 citations), Gender Studies (56 citations), Applied Psychology (30 citations), Health (35 citations) and Clinical Psychology (82 citations). Stephen Hills has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Matthew Walker, Bob Heere, Adam E. Barry, Matthew C. Walker, Henry Wear, D. Yoerger, M. C. Parker, Kathleen Sherman, Heather F. Gidding and Peter A. Brennan. Their work appears in journals such as British Educational Research Journal, International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship, Journal of Sport Management, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health and Sport Management Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact