Stephen Garton

1.2k citations
46 papers · 458 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen Garton

42 papers receiving 354 citations

Peers

Stephen Garton
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • History 89
  • General Psychology 7
  • Horticulture 5
  • Sociology and Political Science 191
  • Public Administration 12
Replace Howard Chiang with:
Howard Chiang United States
Maxine L. Margolis United States
Miles Taylor United Kingdom
Terry H. Anderson United States
Kathleen Rodgers Canada
Mikiso Hane United States
Matthew Waites United Kingdom
Peter Scholliers Belgium
Jenny Bourne United States
John Darby United Kingdom
Stephen Garton relative to Howard Chiang United States Howard Chiang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×12×
Howard Chiang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Garton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Garton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Garton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Garton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Garton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Garton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Garton. The network helps show where Stephen Garton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Garton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Garton Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Garton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199761
2 199041
3 199832
4 199430
5 200228
6 198625
7
Medicine and madness : a social history of insanity in New South Wales, 1880-1940
198825
8 199624
9 198122
10 199113
11 199812
12 199812
13 199211
14 19879
15 19869
16 20028
17 19928
18 20106
19 20146
20 19926

About Stephen Garton

Stephen Garton is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Molecular Biology, Political Science and International Relations, History and Clinical Psychology, having authored 46 papers that have together received 458 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Australian History and Society (17 papers), Plant tissue culture and regeneration (7 papers), Race, History, and American Society (6 papers), Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices (5 papers), World Wars: History, Literature, and Impact (5 papers), Plant Molecular Biology Research (4 papers), Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (4 papers) and Canadian Identity and History (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History (89 citations), General Psychology (7 citations), Horticulture (5 citations), Sociology and Political Science (191 citations) and Public Administration (12 citations). Stephen Garton has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Janet McCalman, V. T. Sapra, James T. Tambong, Paul E. Read, Mark Finnane, Muhammad Hatta, Caula A. Beyl, J. H. A. Barker, A. Karp and Stephen Robertson. Their work appears in journals such as Labour History, Australian Historical Studies, HortScience, Journal of the History of Sexuality and Journal of Social History.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact