Stephen G. Miller
- Molecular Biology top 5%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 2%
- Cell Biology top 5%
- Physiology top 5%
- Epidemiology
- Co-authors
- Mary B. KennedyBruce L. PattonH P MooreKwok‐Kin WongLawrence G. HamannPiet De VosJohan AuwerxRégis Saladin
- Topics
- Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History (11 papers)Classical Antiquity Studies (10 papers)Innovations in Medical Education (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Stephen G. Miller
68 papers receiving 2.8k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 154
- Molecular Biology 1.7k
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 970
- Cell Biology 445
- Physiology 385
- Epidemiology 210
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen G. Miller
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen G. Miller's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen G. Miller with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen G. Miller more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen G. Miller
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen G. Miller. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen G. Miller. The network helps show where Stephen G. Miller may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen G. Miller
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen G. Miller. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen G. Miller based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen G. Miller. Stephen G. Miller is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 9 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 80 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 15 | |
| 11 | Species specificity and receptor domain interaction of a small molecule Tpo receptor agonist, SB-497115 | 2 |
| 12 | 27 | |
| 13 | 13 | |
| 14 | Bacterial endosymbionts from the genus Camponotus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) | 5 |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | 18 | |
| 17 | 68 | |
| 18 | 23 | |
| 19 | 243 | |
| 20 | Arete : ancient writers, papyri, and inscriptions on the history and ideals of Greek athletics and games | 5 |
About Stephen G. Miller
Stephen G. Miller is a scholar working on Archeology, Family Practice and Anthropology, having authored 73 papers that have together received 2.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History (11 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (10 papers) and Innovations in Medical Education (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (970 citations), Family Practice (66 citations) and Cell Biology (445 citations). Stephen G. Miller has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Mary B. Kennedy, Bruce L. Patton, H P Moore, Kwok‐Kin Wong, Lawrence G. Hamann, Piet De Vos, Johan Auwerx, Régis Saladin, Mike Briggs and Anne‐Marie Lefebvre. Their work appears in journals such as Cell, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Journal of Biological Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.