Stephen E. Wong

40 papers receiving 589 citations

Peers

Stephen E. Wong
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Public Administration 68
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 195
  • Clinical Psychology 322
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 189
  • Philosophy 103
Replace Nancy J. Rubin with:
Nancy J. Rubin United States
Shelagh Brumfitt United Kingdom
Bengt‐Åke Armelius Sweden
Robin L. Cautin United States
Anindya Ghosh India
A. C. Carr United Kingdom
Judah L. Ronch United States
Henry C. Rickard United States
António Marques Portugal
Ronald J. Diamond United States
Stephen E. Wong relative to Nancy J. Rubin United States Nancy J. Rubin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×25.8×
Nancy J. Rubin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen E. Wong

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen E. Wong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen E. Wong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen E. Wong more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen E. Wong

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen E. Wong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen E. Wong. The network helps show where Stephen E. Wong may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen E. Wong, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen E. Wong Line = papers co-authored together Stephen E. Wong links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198575
2 200959
3 201150
4 198243
5 201740
6 198730
7 197729
8 199324
9 198823
10 200619
11 198919
12 197817
13 198816
14 197916
15 198116
16 197814
17 200914
18 199313
19 201013
20 200813

About Stephen E. Wong

Stephen E. Wong is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Cognitive Neuroscience and Social Psychology, having authored 42 papers that have together received 661 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Behavioral and Psychological Studies (21 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (12 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (11 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (6 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (6 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (4 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (3 papers) and Health Policy Implementation Science (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (68 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (195 citations), Clinical Psychology (322 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (189 citations) and Philosophy (103 citations). Stephen E. Wong has collaborated with scholars based in United States, New Zealand and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Robert Paul Liberman, Steven P. Schinke, H. Keith Massel, Thomas E. Smith, Paul K. Leung, David Cohen, Tomi Gomory, Jeffrey R. Lacasse, Lewayne D. Gilchrist and Mark J. Macgowan. Their work appears in journals such as Research on Social Work Practice, Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, Journal of Social Service Research, Behavior Modification and Psychiatric Services.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact