Thomas E. Smith

5.2k total citations
199 papers, 3.8k citations indexed

About

Thomas E. Smith is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas E. Smith has authored 199 papers receiving a total of 3.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 88 papers in Clinical Psychology, 67 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health and 65 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Thomas E. Smith's work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (64 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (30 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (22 papers). Thomas E. Smith is often cited by papers focused on Schizophrenia research and treatment (64 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (30 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (22 papers). Thomas E. Smith collaborates with scholars based in United States, Portugal and Israel. Thomas E. Smith's co-authors include Jonathan D. Huppert, James W. Hull, Scott P. Sells, Kim Altman Weiss, Sarah I. Pratt, David Jenkins, Steven M. Silverstein, Marianne Goodman, Lloyd I. Sederer and Marianne R. Yoshioka and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, American Journal of Psychiatry and American Journal of Public Health.

In The Last Decade

Thomas E. Smith

191 papers receiving 3.5k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Thomas E. Smith United States 33 1.8k 1.7k 921 755 641 199 3.8k
Jeffrey L. Geller United States 36 1.5k 0.9× 3.9k 2.3× 1.6k 1.7× 1.2k 1.6× 816 1.3× 253 6.6k
Glen O. Gabbard United States 48 802 0.5× 4.9k 2.9× 1.9k 2.0× 827 1.1× 1.0k 1.6× 274 7.1k
Lindsay G. Oades Australia 37 839 0.5× 2.1k 1.2× 2.3k 2.5× 2.3k 3.1× 519 0.8× 140 5.3k
Felicity Callard United Kingdom 28 1.0k 0.6× 1.1k 0.6× 472 0.5× 786 1.0× 490 0.8× 76 3.7k
Eleanor Maticka‐Tyndale Canada 34 1.7k 1.0× 1.1k 0.7× 583 0.6× 1.9k 2.5× 504 0.8× 114 5.1k
Thomas G. Gutheil United States 28 542 0.3× 1.9k 1.1× 682 0.7× 713 0.9× 459 0.7× 206 3.3k
Thomas Szasz United States 29 763 0.4× 2.4k 1.4× 786 0.9× 1.3k 1.8× 1.5k 2.4× 216 5.2k
Pamela J. Taylor United Kingdom 38 2.0k 1.1× 3.5k 2.0× 746 0.8× 861 1.1× 588 0.9× 171 5.6k
Stijn Vanheule Belgium 32 1.1k 0.6× 1.7k 1.0× 626 0.7× 528 0.7× 537 0.8× 172 3.1k
Larry E. Beutler United States 49 958 0.5× 5.4k 3.2× 2.4k 2.6× 633 0.8× 326 0.5× 254 7.6k

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas E. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas E. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas E. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas E. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas E. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas E. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas E. Smith. The network helps show where Thomas E. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas E. Smith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas E. Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas E. Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas E. Smith. Thomas E. Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Wang, Rui, Mark Olfson, Lisa B. Dixon, et al.. (2023). Engagement of individuals with serious mental illness in outpatient mental health services and telehealth use during the COVID-19 pandemic. Psychiatry Research. 329. 115497–115497. 11 indexed citations
2.
Lekas, Helen‐Maria, Roberto Lewis‐Fernández, Emily Leckman‐Westin, et al.. (2023). Disparities in COVID-19–Related Psychological Distress Among Recipients of a State's Public Mental Health Services. Psychiatric Services. 75(5). 444–450. 1 indexed citations
3.
Compton, Michael T., et al.. (2023). Associations between Social Adversities and Chronic Medical Conditions in a Statewide Sample of Individuals in Treatment for Mental Illnesses. Community Mental Health Journal. 60(2). 251–258. 2 indexed citations
4.
Smith, Thomas E., et al.. (2021). Inpatient Psychiatry During COVID-19. Psychiatric Clinics of North America. 45(1). 45–55. 8 indexed citations
5.
Smith, Thomas E., Melanie M. Wall, Fei Tang, et al.. (2020). Effect of Scheduling a Post-Discharge Outpatient Mental Health Appointment on the Likelihood of Successful Transition From Hospital to Community-Based Care. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 81(5). 16 indexed citations
6.
Mascayano, Franco, Ilana Nossel, Iruma Bello, et al.. (2019). Understanding the implementation of coordinated specialty Care for Early Psychosis in New York state: A guide using the RE‐AIM framework. Early Intervention in Psychiatry. 13(3). 715–719. 20 indexed citations
7.
Smith, Thomas E., et al.. (2019). Financial Therapy With Groups: A Case of the Five-Step Model. Journal of Financial Counseling and Planning. 30(1). 18–26. 7 indexed citations
8.
Smith, Thomas E., et al.. (2016). “Just be a light”: Experiences of peers working on acute inpatient psychiatric units.. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal. 40(4). 387–394. 8 indexed citations
9.
Smith, Thomas E., et al.. (2015). Three Interventions for Financial Therapy. 6(1). 33–43. 2 indexed citations
10.
Smith, Thomas E., et al.. (2008). A Successful Effort to Improve Adherence to Treatment Guidelines for Bipolar Disorder. Harvard Review of Psychiatry. 16(3). 210–213. 11 indexed citations
11.
Pereira, M. Graça & Thomas E. Smith. (2006). Evolution of the biopsychosocial model in the practice of Family Therapy. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 14 indexed citations
12.
Smith, Thomas E., et al.. (2004). Collaborative family health care in an hospital setting: a pilot study on physicians and therapists perceptions. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3 indexed citations
13.
Silverstein, Steven M., Peter J. Uhlhaas, Yulia Landa, et al.. (2004). Effectiveness of a two-phase cognitive rehabilitation intervention for severely impaired schizophrenia patients. Psychological Medicine. 35(6). 829–837. 58 indexed citations
14.
Pereira, M. Graça & Thomas E. Smith. (2003). Collaborative family health care: what do practitioners think. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2 indexed citations
15.
Smith, Thomas E., et al.. (2002). Cognitive functioning and social problem-solving skills in schizophrenia. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry. 7(2). 81–95. 12 indexed citations
16.
Smith, Thomas E., et al.. (2000). Insight, Symptoms, and Neurocognition in Schizophrenia and Schizoaffective Disorder. Schizophrenia Bulletin. 26(1). 193–200. 119 indexed citations
17.
Smith, Thomas E., et al.. (1995). Pilot process research of reflecting conversations. Journal of Family Psychotherapy. 6(3). 71–89. 7 indexed citations
18.
Smith, Thomas E.. (1985). Groupwork with Adolescent Drug Abusers. Social Work With Groups. 8(1). 55–64. 4 indexed citations
19.
Smith, Thomas E., et al.. (1963). Population characteristics of the Commonwealth countries of tropical Africa. 5 indexed citations
20.
Smith, Thomas E.. (1955). Report on the first election of members to the Legislative Council of the Federation of Malaya. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026