Stephen D. Hight

1.6k citations
81 papers · 1.2k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen D. Hight

77 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Stephen D. Hight
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Insect Science 1.0k
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 371
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 199
  • Plant Science 465
  • Ecology 307
Replace C. Zachariades with:
C. Zachariades South Africa
Iain D. Paterson South Africa
René Sforza United States
Hariet L. Hinz Switzerland
Mark Schwarzländer United States
Paul D. Pratt United States
Matthew F. Purcell United States
F.A.C. Impson South Africa
W. A. Palmer Australia
Clifford S. Sadof United States
Stephen D. Hight relative to C. Zachariades South Africa C. Zachariades's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
C. Zachariades · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen D. Hight

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen D. Hight's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen D. Hight with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen D. Hight more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen D. Hight

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen D. Hight. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen D. Hight. The network helps show where Stephen D. Hight may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen D. Hight, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen D. Hight Line = papers co-authored together Stephen D. Hight links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 81 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1993156
2 199586
3 199473
4 200563
5 200262
6 199443
7 200839
8 200938
9 199336
10 201434
11 201929
12 200327
13 200525
14 200921
15 200321
16 199220
17 200519
18 201617
19 201617
20 201417

About Stephen D. Hight

Stephen D. Hight is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science, Food Science and Ecology, having authored 81 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biological Control of Invasive Species (57 papers), Insect behavior and control techniques (39 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (25 papers), Plant and animal studies (21 papers), Botanical Research and Applications (12 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (11 papers), Weed Control and Herbicide Applications (9 papers) and Allelopathy and phytotoxic interactions (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (1.0k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (371 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (199 citations), Plant Science (465 citations) and Ecology (307 citations). Stephen D. Hight has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Argentina and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Bernd Blossey, James E. Carpenter, Stephanie Bloem, Richard A. Malecki, Kenneth A. Bloem, James E. Carpenter, Jack R. Coulson, Loke T. Kok, J. E. Laing and Rosemarie De Clerck-Floate. Their work appears in journals such as Environmental Entomology, BioControl, Biological Control, Biocontrol Science and Technology and Journal of Economic Entomology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact