Stephan Egger

706 citations
43 papers · 290 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Stephan Egger

38 papers receiving 267 citations

Peers

Stephan Egger
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 72
  • Clinical Psychology 70
  • Applied Psychology 16
  • Biological Psychiatry 6
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 23
Replace Jingyu Shi with:
Jingyu Shi China
Anson Kai Chun Chau Hong Kong
Suriati Mohamed Saini Malaysia
Joachim Kowalski Poland
Alejandra Aguilar‐Latorre Spain
Gonca Gül Çelik Türkiye
Núria Aragay Spain
Anastasia Ejova Australia
Patrick Welsh United Kingdom
Manee Pinyopornpanish Thailand
Stephan Egger relative to Jingyu Shi China Jingyu Shi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Jingyu Shi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephan Egger

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephan Egger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephan Egger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephan Egger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephan Egger

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephan Egger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephan Egger. The network helps show where Stephan Egger may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephan Egger, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephan Egger Line = papers co-authored together Stephan Egger links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Vom Gebrauch der Wissenschaft : für eine klinische Soziologie des wissenschaftlichen Feldes
199837
2 202227
3 201719
4 202218
5
¬Die Erben : Studenten, Bildung und Kultur
200718
6 201516
7 202313
8 201912
9 199012
10 202211
11 202211
12 202110
13 201810
14 201610
15 20189
16 20247
17 20165
18 20205
19 20165
20 20214

About Stephan Egger

Stephan Egger is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy and Social Psychology, having authored 43 papers that have together received 290 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (14 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (8 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (5 papers), Psychiatric care and mental health services (4 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (4 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (4 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (3 papers) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (72 citations), Clinical Psychology (70 citations), Applied Psychology (16 citations), Biological Psychiatry (6 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (23 citations). Stephan Egger has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Spain and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Stefan Vetter, Pierre Bourdıeu, Erich Seifritz, Mario Müller, Godehard Weniger, Julio Bobes, Jean-Claude Passeron, Neil N. Eldin, Daniel Schuepbach and Caroline L. Vandeleur. Their work appears in journals such as European Psychiatry, Frontiers in Psychiatry, Psychiatry Research, Frontiers in Public Health and BMC Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact