Stan Williamson

433 total citations
24 papers, 322 citations indexed

About

Stan Williamson is a scholar working on Information Systems and Management, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Stan Williamson has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 322 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Information Systems and Management, 8 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and 7 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Stan Williamson's work include Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (11 papers), Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (7 papers) and Organizational and Employee Performance (6 papers). Stan Williamson is often cited by papers focused on Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (11 papers), Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (7 papers) and Organizational and Employee Performance (6 papers). Stan Williamson collaborates with scholars based in United States, Vietnam and Hong Kong. Stan Williamson's co-authors include Long Pham, Robert E. Stevens, Olivia Harris, Ronald L. Berry, Yam B. Limbu, Peggy L. Lane, Long Pham, T. Selwyn Ellis, Kenneth E. Clow and C. Y. Chan and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Business Ethics, Medical Care Research and Review and Journal of Education for Business.

In The Last Decade

Stan Williamson

24 papers receiving 300 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Stan Williamson United States 10 198 105 84 73 44 24 322
Stacey Whitecotton United States 8 130 0.7× 66 0.6× 48 0.6× 25 0.3× 27 0.6× 10 419
Chiharu Ishida United States 9 62 0.3× 134 1.3× 92 1.1× 161 2.2× 29 0.7× 16 323
Jesse C. Robertson United States 12 171 0.9× 92 0.9× 65 0.8× 12 0.2× 68 1.5× 25 521
Jerry Gravander United States 3 340 1.7× 105 1.0× 105 1.3× 40 0.5× 6 0.1× 8 417
Lu‐Ming Tseng Taiwan 8 74 0.4× 88 0.8× 141 1.7× 66 0.9× 11 0.3× 31 290
A. Ben Oumlil United States 9 90 0.5× 75 0.7× 112 1.3× 189 2.6× 28 0.6× 18 374
Nathalie Montargot France 10 60 0.3× 97 0.9× 49 0.6× 42 0.6× 11 0.3× 43 298
Olivia F. Lee United States 6 52 0.3× 83 0.8× 112 1.3× 139 1.9× 17 0.4× 7 288
Wyatt A. Schrock United States 11 64 0.3× 78 0.7× 191 2.3× 100 1.4× 41 0.9× 18 322
Stacy E. Kovar United States 8 181 0.9× 96 0.9× 81 1.0× 36 0.5× 57 1.3× 16 389

Countries citing papers authored by Stan Williamson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stan Williamson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stan Williamson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stan Williamson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stan Williamson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stan Williamson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stan Williamson. The network helps show where Stan Williamson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stan Williamson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stan Williamson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stan Williamson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stan Williamson. Stan Williamson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Pham, Long, et al.. (2021). Explaining intention to use mobile banking: integrating perceived risk and trust into the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Applied Decision Sciences. 14(1). 55–55. 19 indexed citations
2.
Williamson, Stan, et al.. (2020). Impact of Perceived Risk on Mobile Banking Usage Intentions: Trust as a Mediator and a Moderator. International Journal of Business and Emerging Markets. 12(1). 1–1. 6 indexed citations
3.
Williamson, Stan, et al.. (2020). Individual Investors Satisfaction and Loyalty in Online Securities Trading Using the Technology Acceptance Model. International Journal of Management and Decision Making. 19(2). 1–1. 2 indexed citations
4.
Pham, Long, et al.. (2020). Impact of perceived risk on mobile banking usage intentions: trust as a mediator and a moderator. International Journal of Business and Emerging Markets. 12(1). 94–94. 24 indexed citations
5.
Pham, Long, et al.. (2020). Individual investors' satisfaction and loyalty in online securities trading using the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Management and Decision Making. 19(2). 239–239. 16 indexed citations
6.
Pham, Long, et al.. (2019). The Mediating Role of Perceived Value in the Effect of Multi-Dimensional Risk in Mobile Banking. International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems. 15(4). 1–25. 13 indexed citations
7.
Lane, Peggy L., et al.. (2019). Technology Readiness and Purchase Intention: Role of Perceived Value and Online Satisfaction in the Context of Luxury Hotels. International Journal of Management and Decision Making. 19(1). 1–1. 8 indexed citations
8.
Pham, Long, et al.. (2019). Intention to Use Mobile Commerce. International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems. 16(1). 1–30. 16 indexed citations
9.
Williamson, Stan, et al.. (2011). Sticker Shock: Managements Professors' Perspectives on the Rising Cost of College Textbooks. 1(1). 5 indexed citations
10.
Williamson, Stan, et al.. (2011). Ethical Issues in the Age of the Internet: A Study of Students' Perceptions Using the Multidimensional Ethics Scale. Journal of Internet Commerce. 10(2). 128–143. 15 indexed citations
11.
Stevens, Robert E., David L. Loudon, & Stan Williamson. (1998). Getting It Done: Achieving Law Firm Objectives Through the Development of Effective Marketing Strategies. Journal of Professional Services Marketing. 17(1). 105–118. 2 indexed citations
12.
Williamson, Stan, et al.. (1996). Constituent Surveys as an Input in the Strategic Planning Process for Churches and Ministries. 2(1). 47–59. 1 indexed citations
13.
Stevens, Robert E., David L. Loudon, & Stan Williamson. (1995). A Study of Consumers' Attitudes Toward Veterinarian Advertising. Health Marketing Quarterly. 12(3). 85–94. 6 indexed citations
14.
Williamson, Stan, et al.. (1995). Church and Ministry Culture. 1(1). 105–119. 1 indexed citations
15.
Williamson, Stan, et al.. (1995). Constituent Surveys as an Input in the Strategic Planning Process for Churches and Ministries. 1(2). 43–55. 4 indexed citations
16.
Williamson, Stan & Lawrence R. Jauch. (1995). Research on Hospital Administrators' Ethics: An Agenda. Medical Care Research and Review. 52(1). 134–144. 2 indexed citations
17.
Williamson, Stan, et al.. (1994). Implementing Total Quality Management: The Role of Human Resource Management. S.A.M. advanced management journal. 59(2). 10. 22 indexed citations
18.
Stevens, Robert E., Olivia Harris, & Stan Williamson. (1994). Evaluations of Ethical Situations by University Faculty: A Comparative Study. Journal of Education for Business. 69(3). 145–148. 7 indexed citations
19.
Wallace, Sarah, et al.. (1994). Computerization of a nursing financial management system using continuous quality improvement as a framework.. PubMed. 12(4). 193–200. 1 indexed citations
20.
Stevens, Robert E., Olivia Harris, & Stan Williamson. (1993). A comparison of ethical evaluations of business school faculty and students: A pilot study. Journal of Business Ethics. 12(8). 611–619. 55 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Stacey Whitecotton Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Chiharu Ishida Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jesse C. Robertson Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jerry Gravander Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Lu‐Ming Tseng Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by A. Ben Oumlil Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Nathalie Montargot Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Olivia F. Lee Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Wyatt A. Schrock Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Stacy E. Kovar
Rankless by CCL
2026