Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Citations per year, relative to Tobias Adrian Tobias Adrian (= 1×)
peers
Louis H. Ederington
Countries citing papers authored by Tobias Adrian
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Tobias Adrian's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tobias Adrian with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tobias Adrian more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tobias Adrian. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tobias Adrian. The network helps show where Tobias Adrian may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tobias Adrian
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tobias Adrian.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tobias Adrian based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Tobias Adrian. Tobias Adrian is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Adrian, Tobias, Michael J. Fleming, & Erik Vogt. (2017). An Index of Treasury Market Liquidity: 1991-2017. Econstor (Econstor).1 indexed citations
7.
Adrian, Tobias, et al.. (2016). Corporate Bond Market Liquidity Redux: More Price-Based Evidence. Liberty Street Economics.2 indexed citations
8.
Adrian, Tobias, Michael J. Fleming, Or Shachar, & Erik Vogt. (2015). Redemption Risk of Bond Mutual Funds and Dealer Positioning. Liberty Street Economics.4 indexed citations
9.
Adrian, Tobias, Michael J. Fleming, & Ernst Schaumburg. (2015). Introduction to a Series on Market Liquidity. Liberty Street Economics.
10.
Adrian, Tobias, et al.. (2015). Has U.S. Treasury Market Liquidity Deteriorated. Liberty Street Economics.1 indexed citations
11.
Adrian, Tobias, et al.. (2015). Has Liquidity Risk in the Corporate Bond Market Increased. Liberty Street Economics.3 indexed citations
Adrian, Tobias, et al.. (2009). The term structure of inflation expectations. Econstor (Econstor).23 indexed citations
15.
Adrian, Tobias, Christopher R. Burke, & James McAndrews. (2009). The Federal Reserve's Primary Dealer Credit Facility. SSRN Electronic Journal. 15.33 indexed citations
16.
Adrian, Tobias & Hyun Song Shin. (2008). Liquidity, Monetary Policy, and Financial Cycles. SSRN Electronic Journal. 14.61 indexed citations
17.
Adrian, Tobias & Hyun Song Shin. (2008). Financial Intermediaries, Financial Stability and Monetary Policy *. Econstor (Econstor). 287–334.80 indexed citations
18.
Adrian, Tobias. (2007). Measuring Risk in the Hedge Fund Sector. SSRN Electronic Journal. 13.3 indexed citations
19.
Adrian, Tobias & Michael J. Fleming. (2005). What Financing Data Reveal about Dealer Leverage. SSRN Electronic Journal. 11.16 indexed citations
20.
Kinnon, Christine, et al.. (2001). Sap gene transfer restores cytotoxic function in EBV-CTLS generated from individuals with XLP.. UCL Discovery (University College London).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.