Maya J. Schroevers
- Clinical Psychology top 0.5%
- Social Psychology top 1%
- General Health Professions top 1%
- Oncology top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 1%
- Co-authors
- Nadia GarnefskiG. Aernout SomsenRobbert SandermanAdelita V. RanchorVivian KraaijAngélica LópezEric van SonderenJoke Fleer
- Topics
- Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (43 papers)Cancer survivorship and care (33 papers)Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (20 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONEDiabetes Care
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited StatesChina
In The Last Decade
Maya J. Schroevers
116 papers receiving 5.7k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 155
- Clinical Psychology 2.7k
- Social Psychology 1.2k
- General Health Professions 1.1k
- Oncology 915
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 878
Countries citing papers authored by Maya J. Schroevers
This map shows the geographic impact of Maya J. Schroevers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Maya J. Schroevers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Maya J. Schroevers more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Maya J. Schroevers
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Maya J. Schroevers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Maya J. Schroevers. The network helps show where Maya J. Schroevers may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Maya J. Schroevers
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Maya J. Schroevers. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Maya J. Schroevers based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Maya J. Schroevers. Maya J. Schroevers is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 13 | |
| 7 | 9 | |
| 8 | 11 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 13 | |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 8 | |
| 13 | 15 | |
| 14 | 7 | |
| 15 | 91 | |
| 16 | 11 | |
| 17 | 4 | |
| 18 | 93 | |
| 19 | Validatie van de Nederlandstalige versie van de Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS) | 35 |
| 20 | Algemene controle versus ziektespecifieke controle in relatie tot aanpassing aan kanker | 2 |
About Maya J. Schroevers
Maya J. Schroevers is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Applied Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 122 papers that have together received 5.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (43 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (33 papers) and Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (20 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (2.7k citations), Applied Psychology (642 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (878 citations). Maya J. Schroevers has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Nadia Garnefski, G. Aernout Somsen, Robbert Sanderman, Adelita V. Ranchor, Vivian Kraaij, Angélica López, Eric van Sonderen, Joke Fleer, Ans Smink and Evelien Snippe. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Diabetes Care.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.