Laurence Alison
- Social Psychology top 1%
- Deception detection and forensic psychology 22
- Team Dynamics and Performance 6
- Human-Automation Interaction and Safety 6
- Clinical Psychology top 2%
- Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending 17
- General Decision Sciences top 5%
- Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics 6
- Gender Studies top 2%
-
- Social and Intergroup Psychology 7
-
- Policing Practices and Perceptions 9
-
- Complex Systems and Decision Making 6
- Co-authors
- Paul ChristiansenEmily AlisonSara WaringClaudia van den HeuvelStamatis ElntibNicola PowerAndreas MokrosPekka Santtila
- Journals
- Journal of Applied Psychology (1 paper)American Psychologist (1 paper)Social Science & Medicine (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Laurence Alison
67 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
- Social Psychology 768
- Clinical Psychology 753
- General Decision Sciences 52
- Gender Studies 212
- Sociology and Political Science 897
Countries citing papers authored by Laurence Alison
This map shows the geographic impact of Laurence Alison's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Laurence Alison with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Laurence Alison more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Laurence Alison
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Laurence Alison. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Laurence Alison. The network helps show where Laurence Alison may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Laurence Alison, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 4 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 10 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 3 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 6 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 18 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 4 | |
| 10 | 2019 | 25 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 46 | |
| 12 | 2016 | 38 | |
| 13 | 2014 | 26 | |
| 14 | 2013 | 28 | |
| 15 | 2013 | 25 | |
| 16 | 2008 | 25 | |
| 17 | 2006 | 36 | |
| 18 | 2003 | 38 | |
| 19 | 2002 | 49 | |
| 20 | Rhetoric in "psychic detection." | 2000 | 3 |
About Laurence Alison
Laurence Alison is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Social Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 68 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Deception detection and forensic psychology (22 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (17 papers), Policing Practices and Perceptions (9 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (7 papers), Complex Systems and Decision Making (6 papers), Team Dynamics and Performance (6 papers), Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (6 papers) and Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (768 citations), Clinical Psychology (753 citations) and General Decision Sciences (52 citations). Laurence Alison has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Paul Christiansen, Emily Alison, Sara Waring, Claudia van den Heuvel, Stamatis Elntib, Nicola Power, Andreas Mokros, Pekka Santtila, N. Kenneth Sandnabba and Neil Shortland. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Psychology, American Psychologist and Social Science & Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.