Stacy A. Wetmore
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
- Law top 2%
- Artificial Intelligence
- Co-authors
- Jeffrey S. NeuschatzScott D. GronlundCharles A. GoodsellCurt A. CarlsonLaura MickesTravis M. Seale‐CarlisleHeather D. FloweBrian H. Bornstein
- Topics
- Deception detection and forensic psychology (21 papers)Memory Processes and Influences (19 papers)Jury Decision Making Processes (11 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Stacy A. Wetmore
29 papers receiving 370 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
- Cognitive Neuroscience 278
- Social Psychology 250
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 78
- Law 75
- Artificial Intelligence 70
Countries citing papers authored by Stacy A. Wetmore
This map shows the geographic impact of Stacy A. Wetmore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stacy A. Wetmore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stacy A. Wetmore more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stacy A. Wetmore
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stacy A. Wetmore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stacy A. Wetmore. The network helps show where Stacy A. Wetmore may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stacy A. Wetmore
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stacy A. Wetmore. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stacy A. Wetmore based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stacy A. Wetmore. Stacy A. Wetmore is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | Informants v. Innocents: Informant Testimony and its Contribution to Wrongful Convictions | 2 |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 29 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 22 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 19 | |
| 16 | 56 | |
| 17 | 23 | |
| 18 | 12 | |
| 19 | 0 | |
| 20 | On the power of secondary confessions | 1 |
About Stacy A. Wetmore
Stacy A. Wetmore is a scholar working on Law, Social Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 32 papers that have together received 382 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Deception detection and forensic psychology (21 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (19 papers) and Jury Decision Making Processes (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (278 citations), Social Psychology (250 citations) and Law (75 citations). Stacy A. Wetmore has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jeffrey S. Neuschatz, Scott D. Gronlund, Charles A. Goodsell, Curt A. Carlson, Laura Mickes, Travis M. Seale‐Carlisle, Heather D. Flowe, Brian H. Bornstein, John T. Wixted and Jodi Price. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Cognitive Psychology, Law and Human Behavior and Criminal Justice and Behavior.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.