Srinivas Aravamudan
- Literature and Literary Theory top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Anthropology top 5%
- History top 2%
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Co-authors
- William James EarleSalman RushdieEllen PollakMichael SeidelDeidre LynchJ. Paul HunterPat RogersPaula R. Backscheider
- Topics
- Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies (4 papers)Philippine History and Culture (3 papers)Colonialism, slavery, and trade (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Srinivas Aravamudan
26 papers receiving 161 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
- Literature and Literary Theory 157
- Sociology and Political Science 110
- Anthropology 99
- History 65
- Political Science and International Relations 50
Countries citing papers authored by Srinivas Aravamudan
This map shows the geographic impact of Srinivas Aravamudan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Srinivas Aravamudan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Srinivas Aravamudan more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Srinivas Aravamudan
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Srinivas Aravamudan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Srinivas Aravamudan. The network helps show where Srinivas Aravamudan may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Srinivas Aravamudan
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Srinivas Aravamudan. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Srinivas Aravamudan based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Srinivas Aravamudan. Srinivas Aravamudan is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 29 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | Sovereignty: Between Embodiment and Detranscendentalization | 1 |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 42 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | Obi: or, The History of Three-Fingered Jack | 14 |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 6 | |
| 15 | 13 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 47 | |
| 18 | 8 | |
| 19 | 81 | |
| 20 | 3 |
About Srinivas Aravamudan
Srinivas Aravamudan is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Anthropology and Philosophy, having authored 32 papers that have together received 333 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies (4 papers), Philippine History and Culture (3 papers) and Colonialism, slavery, and trade (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (157 citations), Anthropology (99 citations) and History (65 citations). Srinivas Aravamudan has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include William James Earle, Salman Rushdie, Ellen Pollak, Michael Seidel, Deidre Lynch, J. Paul Hunter, Pat Rogers, Paula R. Backscheider, Maximillian E. Novak and Cynthia Wall. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Asian Studies, Social Text and Eighteenth-Century Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.