Soumen Roy

63 papers receiving 802 citations

Peers

Soumen Roy
Comparison fields: 5 of 128
  • Condensed Matter Physics 159
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 109
  • Sensory Systems 43
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 158
  • Horticulture 4
Replace Arnaud Buhot with:
Arnaud Buhot France
Jooyoung Lee South Korea
Keisuke Matsumoto Japan
Ivan Barvı́k Czechia
Zongyun Chen China
Sergei Nechaev Russia
Indrani Bose India
Justin Gullingsrud United States
Gregory P. Harmer Australia
Soumen Roy relative to Arnaud Buhot France Arnaud Buhot's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Arnaud Buhot · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Soumen Roy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Soumen Roy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Soumen Roy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Soumen Roy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Soumen Roy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Soumen Roy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Soumen Roy. The network helps show where Soumen Roy may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Soumen Roy, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Soumen Roy Line = papers co-authored together Soumen Roy links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 64 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201097
2 201079
3 201752
4 200139
5 201339
6 201538
7 201833
8 200327
9 201024
10 198022
11 201520
12 201219
13 200418
14 200317
15 201516
16 200515
17 201514
18 199414
19 200814
20 201513

About Soumen Roy

Soumen Roy is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Molecular Biology, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Materials Chemistry and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, having authored 64 papers that have together received 832 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Theoretical and Computational Physics (23 papers), Liquid Crystal Research Advancements (14 papers), Material Dynamics and Properties (13 papers), Complex Network Analysis Techniques (8 papers), Molecular spectroscopy and chirality (7 papers), Stochastic processes and statistical mechanics (7 papers), Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (5 papers) and Quantum many-body systems (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (159 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (109 citations), Sensory Systems (43 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (158 citations) and Horticulture (4 citations). Soumen Roy has collaborated with scholars based in India, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Raissa M. D’Souza, Sudeshna Dasgupta, Suman Sinha, Subhrajit Dutta, Daniel L. Hartl, Elena R. Lozovsky, K M Brown, Wenxin Xu, Didier A. Depireux and Benjamin Shapiro. Their work appears in journals such as Physics Letters A, Computer Physics Communications, Bioinformatics, Liquid Crystals and Physical review. E.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact