Benjamin Shapiro

2.1k total citations
67 papers, 1.5k citations indexed

About

Benjamin Shapiro is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Condensed Matter Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, Benjamin Shapiro has authored 67 papers receiving a total of 1.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 34 papers in Biomedical Engineering, 17 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering and 11 papers in Condensed Matter Physics. Recurrent topics in Benjamin Shapiro's work include Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies (12 papers), Micro and Nano Robotics (11 papers) and Characterization and Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles (9 papers). Benjamin Shapiro is often cited by papers focused on Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies (12 papers), Micro and Nano Robotics (11 papers) and Characterization and Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles (9 papers). Benjamin Shapiro collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Australia. Benjamin Shapiro's co-authors include Elisabeth Smela, Robin L. Garrell, Chang‐Jin Kim, Hyejin Moon, Shawn W. Walker, Roland Probst, Edo Waks, M. Christophersen, Didier A. Depireux and Sandip Kulkarni and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Nature Communications and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.

In The Last Decade

Benjamin Shapiro

63 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Benjamin Shapiro United States 22 996 482 252 224 184 67 1.5k
Alex Nemiroski United States 14 1.2k 1.2× 261 0.5× 414 1.6× 206 0.9× 51 0.3× 20 1.8k
Victor V. Yashin United States 25 479 0.5× 109 0.2× 633 2.5× 464 2.1× 179 1.0× 78 1.7k
Jaemin Kim South Korea 20 833 0.8× 809 1.7× 159 0.6× 605 2.7× 33 0.2× 97 1.6k
Jabulani R. Barber United States 15 1.0k 1.0× 1.1k 2.2× 351 1.4× 296 1.3× 42 0.2× 17 1.9k
Haibo Ding China 23 718 0.7× 367 0.8× 158 0.6× 57 0.3× 92 0.5× 51 1.6k
Ian G. Foulds Canada 23 1.1k 1.1× 837 1.7× 219 0.9× 93 0.4× 24 0.1× 99 1.6k
Pablo F. Damasceno United States 13 613 0.6× 188 0.4× 417 1.7× 219 1.0× 227 1.2× 23 1.9k
Shengyun Ji China 21 894 0.9× 211 0.4× 345 1.4× 271 1.2× 51 0.3× 43 1.4k
Jingang Li United States 23 612 0.6× 370 0.8× 113 0.4× 106 0.5× 48 0.3× 82 1.4k
Hyeon‐Ho Jeong South Korea 20 1.2k 1.2× 329 0.7× 309 1.2× 702 3.1× 106 0.6× 55 2.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Benjamin Shapiro

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benjamin Shapiro's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benjamin Shapiro with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benjamin Shapiro more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benjamin Shapiro

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benjamin Shapiro. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benjamin Shapiro. The network helps show where Benjamin Shapiro may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Benjamin Shapiro

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Benjamin Shapiro. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Benjamin Shapiro based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Benjamin Shapiro. Benjamin Shapiro is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Adams, Colin, et al.. (2024). Hyperbolic knotoids. European Journal of Mathematics. 10(3).
2.
Ramaswamy, Bharath, Soumen Roy, Andrea B. Apolo, Benjamin Shapiro, & Didier A. Depireux. (2017). Magnetic Nanoparticle Mediated Steroid Delivery Mitigates Cisplatin Induced Hearing Loss. Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience. 11. 268–268. 52 indexed citations
3.
Kulkarni, Sandip, et al.. (2015). Quantifying the motion of magnetic particles in excised tissue: Effect of particle properties and applied magnetic field. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials. 393. 243–252. 21 indexed citations
4.
Ramaswamy, Bharath, Sandip Kulkarni, Richard S. Smith, et al.. (2015). Movement of magnetic nanoparticles in brain tissue: mechanisms and impact on normal neuronal function. Nanomedicine Nanotechnology Biology and Medicine. 11(7). 1821–1829. 45 indexed citations
5.
Ropp, Chad, et al.. (2015). Nanoscale probing of image-dipole interactions in a metallic nanostructure. Nature Communications. 6(1). 6558–6558. 45 indexed citations
6.
Tangrea, Michael A., Brian Yang, Alex Rosenberg, et al.. (2014). Multiplex Quantitative Measurement of mRNAs From Fixed Tissue Microarray Sections. Applied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology. 22(5). 323–330. 1 indexed citations
7.
Ropp, Chad, Sanghee Nah, Sijia Qin, et al.. (2013). Fabrication of Nanoassemblies Using Flow Control. Nano Letters. 13(8). 3936–3941. 9 indexed citations
8.
Ropp, Chad, et al.. (2013). Nanoscale imaging and spontaneous emission control with a single nano-positioned quantum dot. Nature Communications. 4(1). 1447–1447. 63 indexed citations
9.
Probst, Roland, et al.. (2013). Electrokinetic tweezing: three-dimensional manipulation of microparticles by real-time imaging and flow control. Lab on a Chip. 13(20). 4040–4040. 8 indexed citations
10.
Mahoney, James J., et al.. (2013). Preliminary findings of the effects of rivastigmine, an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, on working memory in cocaine-dependent volunteers. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry. 50. 137–142. 14 indexed citations
11.
Tangrea, Michael A., et al.. (2011). Quantifying mRNA levels across tissue sections with 2D-RT-qPCR. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry. 400(10). 3383–3393. 3 indexed citations
12.
Komaee, Arash & Benjamin Shapiro. (2011). Magnetic steering of a distributed ferrofluid spot towards a deep target with minimal spreading. 7950–7955. 15 indexed citations
13.
Berglund, Andrew J., et al.. (2011). Simultaneous positioning and orientation of a single nano-object by flow control: theory and simulations. New Journal of Physics. 13(1). 13027–13027. 16 indexed citations
14.
Shapiro, Benjamin, et al.. (2010). A Two-Magnet System to Push Therapeutic Nanoparticles. AIP conference proceedings. 1311(1). 77–88. 48 indexed citations
15.
Ropp, Chad, Roland Probst, Sijia Qin, et al.. (2010). Positioning and Immobilization of Individual Quantum Dots with Nanoscale Precision. Nano Letters. 10(11). 4673–4679. 26 indexed citations
16.
Shapiro, Benjamin. (2009). Towards dynamic control of magnetic fields to focus magnetic carriers to targets deep inside the body. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials. 321(10). 1594–1599. 72 indexed citations
17.
Rodriguez‐Canales, Jaime, John W. Gillespie, Michael A. Tangrea, et al.. (2009). 2D-PCR: a method of mapping DNA in tissue sections. Lab on a Chip. 9(24). 3526–3526. 4 indexed citations
18.
Piyasena, Menake E., J. Newby, Thomas J. Miller, Benjamin Shapiro, & Elisabeth Smela. (2009). Electroosmotically driven microfluidic actuators. Sensors and Actuators B Chemical. 141(1). 263–269. 29 indexed citations
20.
Shapiro, Benjamin. (1998). Hypercium: An Herbal Antidepressant. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 4(1). 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026