Computer Physics Communications

373.0k citations
10.3k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
    • Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
    • High-Energy Particle Collisions Research
    • Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
    • Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
    • Atomic and Molecular Physics
    • Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies

Papers in

    • Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies 875
    • Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions 598
    • Magnetic confinement fusion research 583
    • Numerical methods for differential equations 466

Computer Physics Communications

9.6k papers receiving 358.5k citations

Peers

Computer Physics Communications
Comparison fields: 5 of 240
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 89.1k
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 99.8k
  • Numerical Analysis 12.5k
  • Condensed Matter Physics 22.5k
  • Materials Chemistry 89.5k
Replace Physics Today with:
Physics Today United States
Physica Scripta China
American Journal of Physics United States
Physics Reports United States
Physics Letters A United States
Journal of Mathematical Physics United States
Annals of Physics United States
Journal of the Franklin Institute China
Journal of Computational Physics United States
Progress of Theoretical Physics Japan
Computer Physics Communications relative to Physics Today United States Physics Today's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.1×
Physics Today · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Computer Physics Communications

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Computer Physics Communications. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Computer Physics Communications with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Computer Physics Communications more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Computer Physics Communications

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Computer Physics Communications. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Computer Physics Communications.

About Computer Physics Communications

The 10.3k papers published in Computer Physics Communications in the last decades have received a total of 373.0k indexed citations . Papers published in Computer Physics Communications usually cover Nuclear and High Energy Physics (2.2k papers), Numerical Analysis (644 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (3.1k papers), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (1.2k papers) and Condensed Matter Physics (958 papers) specifically the topics of Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (1.0k papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (875 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (623 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (598 papers), Theoretical and Computational Physics (596 papers), Magnetic confinement fusion research (583 papers), Numerical methods for differential equations (466 papers) and Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (434 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Computer Physics Communications are Stephen W. Provencher, Georg K. H. Madsen, Herman J. C. Berendsen, David van der Spoel, Rudi van Drunen, Torbjörn Sjöstrand, David J. Singh, Andrea Saltelli, Benoı̂t Roux and Charlotte Froese Fischer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact