Countries where authors publish in Liquid Crystals
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Liquid Crystals. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Liquid Crystals with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Liquid Crystals more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Liquid Crystals. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Liquid Crystals.
About Liquid Crystals
The 7.3k papers published in Liquid Crystals in the last decades have received a total of 122.2k indexed citations . Papers published in Liquid Crystals usually cover Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (6.6k papers), Spectroscopy (2.1k papers) and Organic Chemistry (2.9k papers) specifically the topics of Liquid Crystal Research Advancements (6.5k papers), Molecular spectroscopy and chirality (2.0k papers), Surfactants and Colloidal Systems (1.8k papers), Photonic Crystals and Applications (1.0k papers), Synthesis and Properties of Aromatic Compounds (759 papers), Photochromic and Fluorescence Chemistry (704 papers), Plant Reproductive Biology (645 papers) and Advanced Materials and Mechanics (632 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Liquid Crystals are Corrie T. Imrie, Sandeep Kumar, John W. Goodby, G. Pelzl, G. R. Luckhurst, Peter A. Henderson, R. Dąbrowski, D. Demus, Oleg D. Lavrentovich and Carsten Tschierske.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.