European Planning Studies

2.9k papers and 63.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.9k papers published in European Planning Studies in the last decades have received a total of 63.4k indexed citations. Papers published in European Planning Studies usually cover Economics and Econometrics (1.1k papers), Political Science and International Relations (1.1k papers) and Urban Studies (857 papers) specifically the topics of Regional Development and Policy (719 papers), Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis (406 papers) and Cultural Industries and Urban Development (387 papers). The most active scholars publishing in European Planning Studies are Erik Stam, Patsy Healey, Robert Hassink, Roberta Capello, Philip Cooke, Stuart A. Rosenfeld, Petter Næss, Gert‐Jan Hospers, Simin Davoudi and Andreas Faludi.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in European Planning Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in European Planning Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in European Planning Studies.

Countries where authors publish in European Planning Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in European Planning Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in European Planning Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites European Planning Studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025