Robert M. Vanderbeck

44 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Robert M. Vanderbeck
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Urban Studies 113
  • Geography, Planning and Development 100
  • Sociology and Political Science 791
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 150
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 21
Replace Bettina van Hoven with:
Bettina van Hoven Netherlands
Sophie Bowlby United Kingdom
Sarah Neal United Kingdom
Marco Antonsich United Kingdom
Juliana Mansvelt New Zealand
Kevin E. McHugh United States
David M. Hummon United States
Paulus Huigen Netherlands
Lia Karsten Netherlands
Michael Leyshon United Kingdom
Robert M. Vanderbeck relative to Bettina van Hoven Netherlands Bettina van Hoven's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Bettina van Hoven · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert M. Vanderbeck

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert M. Vanderbeck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert M. Vanderbeck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert M. Vanderbeck more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert M. Vanderbeck

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert M. Vanderbeck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert M. Vanderbeck. The network helps show where Robert M. Vanderbeck may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Robert M. Vanderbeck, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert M. Vanderbeck Line = papers co-authored together Robert M. Vanderbeck links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20191
2 20196
3 201814
4 20189
5 201711
6 20172
7 201726
8 20167
9 20135
10 201262
11 201137
12 201113
13 20114
14 20109
15 201011
16 200718
17 200643
18 200628
19 200567
20 200355

About Robert M. Vanderbeck

Robert M. Vanderbeck is a scholar working on Urban Studies, Geography, Planning and Development, Law, Sociology and Political Science and Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management, having authored 45 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religion and Society Interactions (7 papers), Religious Freedom and Discrimination (7 papers), Marriage and Sexual Relationships (6 papers), LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (5 papers), Rural development and sustainability (5 papers), Participatory Visual Research Methods (4 papers), Children's Rights and Participation (4 papers) and Environmental Education and Sustainability (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urban Studies (113 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (100 citations), Sociology and Political Science (791 citations), General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (150 citations) and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (21 citations). Robert M. Vanderbeck has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Gill Valentine, James H. Johnson, Joanna Sadgrove, Katie McQuaid, Johan Andersson, Kristina Diprose, Kevin Ward, Nancy Worth, Paul Johnson and Jessica Hayes‐Conroy. Their work appears in journals such as Sexualities, Environment and Planning A Economy and Space, Children s Geographies, Gender Place & Culture and Sociology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026