Kevin Dorst
Impact in
- Philosophy top 2%
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- General Decision Sciences top 10%
- Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Papers in ⓘ
- Philosophy 11
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 10
-
- Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics 6
- Co-authors
- Matthew Mandelkern (3 shared papers)Brooke E. Husic (1 shared paper)Branden Fitelson (1 shared paper)Brian Hedden (1 shared paper)Roderick Walden (1 shared paper)Samuel J. Gershman (1 shared paper)Salvador Mascarenhas (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Philosophy and Phenomenological Research (2 papers)Mind (2 papers)Thought A Journal of Philosophy (2 papers)The Philosophical Review (2 papers)Thinking & Reasoning (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaSouth Korea
In The Last Decade
Kevin Dorst
14 papers receiving 184 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 30
- Philosophy 159
- General Decision Sciences 23
- History and Philosophy of Science 28
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 66
- Family Practice 8
Countries citing papers authored by Kevin Dorst
This map shows the geographic impact of Kevin Dorst's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kevin Dorst with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kevin Dorst more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kevin Dorst
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kevin Dorst. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kevin Dorst. The network helps show where Kevin Dorst may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 7 scholars most cited alongside Kevin Dorst, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 73 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 30 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 21 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 17 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 15 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 10 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 10 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 8 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 4 | |
| 10 | Why Rational People Polarize | 2019 | 3 |
| 11 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 13 | The integration of design parameters and the establishment of constraint and priority for innovation | 2013 | 1 |
| 14 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2022 | 0 | |
| 16 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 17 | 2020 | 0 |
About Kevin Dorst
Kevin Dorst is a scholar working on Philosophy, General Decision Sciences, Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 17 papers that have together received 195 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (10 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (6 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (3 papers), Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence (3 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (3 papers), Free Will and Agency (3 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (3 papers) and Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (159 citations), General Decision Sciences (23 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (28 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (66 citations) and Family Practice (8 citations). Kevin Dorst has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Matthew Mandelkern, Brooke E. Husic, Branden Fitelson, Brian Hedden, Roderick Walden, Samuel J. Gershman and Salvador Mascarenhas. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Mind, Thought A Journal of Philosophy, The Philosophical Review and Thinking & Reasoning.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.