Kevin Dorst

470 total citations
17 papers, 195 citations indexed

About

Kevin Dorst is a scholar working on Philosophy, General Decision Sciences and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Kevin Dorst has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 195 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Philosophy, 6 papers in General Decision Sciences and 5 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Kevin Dorst's work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (10 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (6 papers) and Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (3 papers). Kevin Dorst is often cited by papers focused on Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (10 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (6 papers) and Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (3 papers). Kevin Dorst collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and Ivory Coast. Kevin Dorst's co-authors include Matthew Mandelkern, Branden Fitelson, Brooke E. Husic, Brian Hedden, Roderick Walden, Samuel J. Gershman and Salvador Mascarenhas and has published in prestigious journals such as Psychological Science, The Philosophical Review and Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.

In The Last Decade

Kevin Dorst

14 papers receiving 184 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Kevin Dorst United States	8	159	66	56	38	37	17	195
Susanna Rinard United States	7	230 1.4×	86 1.3×	100 1.8×	23 0.6×	39 1.1×	12	263
Levi Spectre Israel	7	233 1.5×	93 1.4×	105 1.9×	52 1.4×	40 1.1×	22	315
Sinan Dogramaci United States	8	238 1.5×	128 1.9×	97 1.7×	24 0.6×	53 1.4×	18	260
Chris Ranalli Netherlands	8	150 0.9×	57 0.9×	36 0.6×	35 0.9×	51 1.4×	21	208
Julia Staffel United States	13	304 1.9×	129 2.0×	134 2.4×	54 1.4×	45 1.2×	24	338
Thomas Grundmann Germany	8	154 1.0×	66 1.0×	68 1.2×	19 0.5×	45 1.2×	33	195
Joachim Horvath Germany	9	176 1.1×	96 1.5×	126 2.3×	15 0.4×	21 0.6×	25	239
Maria Lasonen‐Aarnio Finland	8	357 2.2×	178 2.7×	174 3.1×	38 1.0×	65 1.8×	19	381
Patrick Rysiew Canada	9	291 1.8×	197 3.0×	93 1.7×	76 2.0×	50 1.4×	27	327
Bob Beddor Singapore	10	217 1.4×	113 1.7×	101 1.8×	44 1.2×	33 0.9×	26	246

Countries citing papers authored by Kevin Dorst

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kevin Dorst's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kevin Dorst with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kevin Dorst more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kevin Dorst

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kevin Dorst. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kevin Dorst. The network helps show where Kevin Dorst may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kevin Dorst

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kevin Dorst. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kevin Dorst based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kevin Dorst. Kevin Dorst is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

17 of 17 papers shown

1.

Dorst, Kevin, et al.. (2025). On the Robustness and Provenance of the Gambler’s Fallacy. Psychological Science. 36(6). 451–464.

2.

Dorst, Kevin, et al.. (2024). The conjunction fallacy: confirmation or relevance?. Thinking & Reasoning. 31(1). 82–108. 1 indexed citations

3.

Dorst, Kevin. (2023). Rational Polarization. The Philosophical Review. 132(3). 355–458. 15 indexed citations

4.

Dorst, Kevin. (2023). Being Rational and Being Wrong. 23(1). 1 indexed citations

5.

Dorst, Kevin, et al.. (2022). Splitting the (In)Difference. Thought A Journal of Philosophy. 11(1). 14–23.

6.

Dorst, Kevin & Matthew Mandelkern. (2021). Good Guesses. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 105(3). 581–618. 17 indexed citations

7.

Hedden, Brian & Kevin Dorst. (2021). (Almost) all evidence is higher-order evidence. Analysis. 82(3). 417–425. 1 indexed citations

8.

Dorst, Kevin. (2021). Rational Polarization. SSRN Electronic Journal. 10 indexed citations

9.

Mandelkern, Matthew & Kevin Dorst. (2021). Assertion is weak. 22(0). 8 indexed citations

10.

Dorst, Kevin, et al.. (2021). Deference Done Better. Philosophical Perspectives. 35(1). 99–150. 10 indexed citations

11.

Dorst, Kevin. (2020). Epistemic Consequentialism. The Philosophical Review. 129(3). 484–489.

12.

Dorst, Kevin. (2019). Why Rational People Polarize. PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation). 3 indexed citations

13.

Dorst, Kevin. (2019). Evidence: A Guide for the Uncertain. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 100(3). 586–632. 30 indexed citations

14.

Dorst, Kevin. (2018). Abominable KK Failures. Mind. 128(512). 1227–1259. 21 indexed citations

15.

Dorst, Kevin. (2017). Lockeans Maximize Expected Accuracy. Mind. 128(509). 175–211. 73 indexed citations

16.

Dorst, Kevin. (2014). Can the Knowledge Norm Co-Opt the Opt Out?. Thought A Journal of Philosophy. 3(4). 273–282. 4 indexed citations

17.

Walden, Roderick & Kevin Dorst. (2013). The integration of design parameters and the establishment of constraint and priority for innovation. UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney). 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact