Lou Goble

566 total citations
22 papers, 310 citations indexed

About

Lou Goble is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Philosophy. According to data from OpenAlex, Lou Goble has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 310 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Artificial Intelligence, 7 papers in Computational Theory and Mathematics and 5 papers in Philosophy. Recurrent topics in Lou Goble's work include Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (9 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (7 papers) and Semantic Web and Ontologies (4 papers). Lou Goble is often cited by papers focused on Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (9 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (7 papers) and Semantic Web and Ontologies (4 papers). Lou Goble collaborates with scholars based in United States and Netherlands. Lou Goble's co-authors include Michael J. Zimmerman, Gert‐Jan C. Lokhorst and John‐Jules Ch. Meyer and has published in prestigious journals such as The Philosophical Review, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research and Noûs.

In The Last Decade

Lou Goble

20 papers receiving 254 citations

Peers

Lou Goble

AI

PHILO

CN

CTM

ECP

Lennart Åqvist Sweden

Franz von Kutschera Germany

Patrick Greenough United Kingdom

Fabrizio Cariani United States

Rosanna Keefe United Kingdom

Geoffrey Hunter United Kingdom

Delia Graff United States

Justin Khoo United States

Jeremy Goodman United States

Jack Woods United Kingdom

Lennart Åqvist Sweden

Lou Goble

193 ×1.3

AI

74 ×0.5

PHILO

47 ×0.4

CN

93 ×1.5

CTM

81 ×1.3

ECP

Citations per year, relative to Lou Goble Lou Goble (= 1×) peers Lennart Åqvist

Countries citing papers authored by Lou Goble

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lou Goble's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lou Goble with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lou Goble more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lou Goble

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lou Goble. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lou Goble. The network helps show where Lou Goble may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lou Goble

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lou Goble. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lou Goble based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lou Goble. Lou Goble is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

Goble, Lou. (2009). Normative Conflicts and The Logic of ‘Ought’. Noûs. 43(3). 450–489. 18 indexed citations

2.

Goble, Lou & John‐Jules Ch. Meyer. (2006). Deontic Logic and Artificial Normative Systems: 8th International Workshop on Deontic Logic in Computer Science, DEON 2006, Utrecht, The Netherlands, July ... (Lecture Notes in Computer Science). Springer eBooks. 1 indexed citations

3.

Goble, Lou. (2005). A logic for deontic dilemmas. Journal of Applied Logic. 3(3-4). 461–483. 34 indexed citations

4.

Goble, Lou. (2004). Combinator Logics. Studia Logica. 76(1). 17–66. 2 indexed citations

5.

Lokhorst, Gert‐Jan C. & Lou Goble. (2004). MALLY’S DEONTIC LOGIC. Grazer Philosophische Studien. 67(1). 37–57. 7 indexed citations

6.

Goble, Lou. (2003). Neighborhoods for Entailment. Journal of Philosophical Logic. 32(5). 483–529. 8 indexed citations

7.

Goble, Lou. (2000). Multiplex semantics for deontic logic. 5(2). 113–134. 19 indexed citations

8.

Goble, Lou. (2000). An Incomplete Relevant Modal Logic. Journal of Philosophical Logic. 29(1). 103–119. 4 indexed citations

9.

Goble, Lou & Michael J. Zimmerman. (2000). The Concept of Moral Obligation. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 60(1). 242–242. 102 indexed citations

10.

Goble, Lou, et al.. (1998). Being Good and Being Logical: Philosophical Groundwork for a New Deontic Logic.. The Philosophical Review. 107(2). 298–298. 5 indexed citations

11.

Goble, Lou. (1996). `Ought' and Extensionality. Noûs. 30(3). 330–330. 4 indexed citations

12.

Goble, Lou. (1996). Utilitarian deontic logic. Philosophical Studies. 82(3). 317–357. 29 indexed citations

13.

Goble, Lou. (1994). Quantified deontic logic with definite descriptions. Logique et analyse/Logique et analyse. Nouvelle série. 37. 239–253. 1 indexed citations

14.

Goble, Lou. (1993). The logic of obligation, ?better? and ?worse?. Philosophical Studies. 70(2). 133–163. 17 indexed citations

15.

Goble, Lou. (1990). A logic of good, should, and would. Journal of Philosophical Logic. 19(2). 169–199. 16 indexed citations

16.

Goble, Lou. (1990). A logic ofGood, Should, andWould. Journal of Philosophical Logic. 19(3). 253–276. 9 indexed citations

17.

Goble, Lou. (1989). A logic of better. Logique et analyse/Logique et analyse. Nouvelle série. 32(27). 5 indexed citations

18.

Goble, Lou. (1973). A simplified semantics for modal logic.. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic. 14(2). 4 indexed citations

19.

Goble, Lou. (1973). Opacity and the Ought-to-Be. Noûs. 7(4). 407–407. 3 indexed citations

20.

Goble, Lou. (1972). Necessity and Identity. Canadian Journal of Philosophy. 2(1). 55–72. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact