Sharon Stansfield

40 papers receiving 648 citations

Peers

Sharon Stansfield
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Control and Systems Engineering 296
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 255
  • Human-Computer Interaction 149
  • Biomedical Engineering 126
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 118
Replace C.L. Teo with:
C.L. Teo Singapore
Venketesh N. Dubey United Kingdom
Alain Pruski France
Claude Andriot France
E. Einhorn Germany
François Ferland Canada
Birgit Graf Germany
Travis Deyle United States
Daisuke Chugo Japan
Štěpán Obdržálek Czechia
Sharon Stansfield relative to C.L. Teo Singapore C.L. Teo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
C.L. Teo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sharon Stansfield

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sharon Stansfield's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sharon Stansfield with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sharon Stansfield more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sharon Stansfield

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sharon Stansfield. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sharon Stansfield. The network helps show where Sharon Stansfield may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sharon Stansfield

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sharon Stansfield. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sharon Stansfield based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sharon Stansfield. Sharon Stansfield is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 3
2 12
3 3
4 1
5
Emotional and performance attributes of a VR game: a study of children.
8
6 13
7 15
8 6
9 41
10
Applications of virtual reality to nuclear safeguards and non-proliferation
2
11 16
12 7
13 5
14
A computer-based training system combining virtual reality and multimedia
3
15 13
16 1
17
Reasoning about grasping
5
18 116
19 35
20
ANGY: A Rule-Based Expert System for Identifying and Isolating Coronary Vessels in Digital Angiograms
4

About Sharon Stansfield

Sharon Stansfield is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Occupational Therapy and Control and Systems Engineering, having authored 42 papers that have together received 700 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Robot Manipulation and Learning (9 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (8 papers) and EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (149 citations), Control and Systems Engineering (296 citations) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (255 citations). Sharon Stansfield has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Nadine E. Miner, Lydia Tapia, Monica Prasad, Ron R. Hightower, Ruzena Bajcsy, Karen Freeman, David Rogers, William M. Pugh, C. David Cooke and Evan A. Suma. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, The International Journal of Robotics Research and IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026