Shane Nackerud

602 total citations · 1 hit paper
19 papers, 459 citations indexed

About

Shane Nackerud is a scholar working on Library and Information Sciences, Information Systems and Education. According to data from OpenAlex, Shane Nackerud has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 459 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Library and Information Sciences, 7 papers in Information Systems and 3 papers in Education. Recurrent topics in Shane Nackerud's work include Library Science and Administration (11 papers), Library Science and Information Literacy (11 papers) and Web and Library Services (5 papers). Shane Nackerud is often cited by papers focused on Library Science and Administration (11 papers), Library Science and Information Literacy (11 papers) and Web and Library Services (5 papers). Shane Nackerud collaborates with scholars based in United States, Belgium and Czechia. Shane Nackerud's co-authors include Jan Fransen, Krista M. Soria, David W. Peterson, Kristi Jensen, Megan Oakleaf, Ross MacIntyre, Graham Stone, Malcolm Brown, Shanda Hunt and Sarah Brown and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of Academic Librarianship, College & Research Libraries and portal Libraries and the Academy.

In The Last Decade

Shane Nackerud

18 papers receiving 395 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Library Use and Undergraduate Student Outcomes: New Evidence for Students’ Retention and Academic Success

2013 180 citations Krista M. Soria, Jan Fransen et al. portal Libraries and the Academy profile →

Peers

Shane Nackerud

LIS

IS

EDUCA

CSA

DEP

Jan Fransen United States

Barbara Blummer United States

Merinda Kaye Hensley United States

Lisa Janicke Hinchliffe United States

Clarence Maybee United States

Susie Andretta United Kingdom

John D. Shank United States

Jesús Lau Mexico

Stuart Boon United Kingdom

Donald Beagle United States

Jan Fransen United States

Shane Nackerud

338 ×1.1

LIS

231 ×1.1

IS

173 ×1.0

EDUCA

41 ×0.8

CSA

23 ×0.9

DEP

Citations per year, relative to Shane Nackerud Shane Nackerud (= 1×) peers Jan Fransen

Countries citing papers authored by Shane Nackerud

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Shane Nackerud's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Shane Nackerud with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Shane Nackerud more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Shane Nackerud

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Shane Nackerud. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Shane Nackerud. The network helps show where Shane Nackerud may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Shane Nackerud

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Shane Nackerud. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Shane Nackerud based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Shane Nackerud. Shane Nackerud is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

19 of 19 papers shown

1.

Nackerud, Shane, et al.. (2024). Preserving What We Publish: Findings from the Library Publishing Coalition Preservation Task Force. College & Research Libraries News. 85(1).

2.

Hunt, Shanda, et al.. (2020). Library Research Sprints as a Tool to Engage Faculty and Promote Collaboration. portal Libraries and the Academy. 20(2). 305–338. 1 indexed citations

3.

Nackerud, Shane. (2018). The Evolution of Affordable Content Efforts in the Higher Education Environment: Programs, Case Studies and Examples. ODU Digital Commons (Old Dominion University). 10 indexed citations

4.

Oakleaf, Megan, et al.. (2017). Data in the library is safe, but that’s not what data is meant for: Exploring the longitudinal, responsible use of library and institutional data to understand and increase student success. 3 indexed citations

5.

Soria, Krista M., et al.. (2017). The Impact of Academic Library Resources on First-Year Students’ Learning Outcomes. 6 indexed citations

6.

Soria, Krista M., Jan Fransen, & Shane Nackerud. (2017). Beyond Books: The Extended Academic Benefits of Library Use for First-Year College Students. College & Research Libraries. 78(1). 8–22. 40 indexed citations

7.

Oakleaf, Megan, et al.. (2017). Closing the data gap: Integrating library data into institutional learning analytics. 1 indexed citations

8.

Soria, Krista M., Jan Fransen, & Shane Nackerud. (2017). Beyond Books: The Extended Academic Benefits of Library Use for First-Year College Students. College & Research Libraries. 78(1). 32 indexed citations

9.

Soria, Krista M., et al.. (2015). Socioeconomic Indicators Associated with First-year College Students' Use of Academic Libraries. The Journal of Academic Librarianship. 41(5). 636–643. 24 indexed citations

10.

Soria, Krista M., Jan Fransen, & Shane Nackerud. (2014). Stacks, Serials, Search Engines, and Students' Success: First-Year Undergraduate Students' Library Use, Academic Achievement, and Retention. The Journal of Academic Librarianship. 40(1). 84–91. 91 indexed citations

11.

Nackerud, Shane, et al.. (2013). Analyzing Demographics: Assessing Library Use Across the Institution. portal Libraries and the Academy. 13(2). 131–145. 35 indexed citations

12.

Oakleaf, Megan, et al.. (2013). Do or Do Not...There is No Try: The Quest for Library Value. University of Huddersfield Repository (University of Huddersfield). 1 indexed citations

13.

Soria, Krista M., Jan Fransen, & Shane Nackerud. (2013). Library Use and Undergraduate Student Outcomes: New Evidence for Students’ Retention and Academic Success. portal Libraries and the Academy. 13(2). 147–164. 180 indexed citations breakdown →

14.

Nackerud, Shane, et al.. (2012). Library Data and Student Success. HIMALAYA. 3 indexed citations

15.

Nackerud, Shane, et al.. (2010). Library Integration--5000 Courses at a Time. HIMALAYA. 1 indexed citations

16.

Nackerud, Shane, et al.. (2008). Affinity Strings: Enterprise data for resource recommendations. University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy (University of Minnesota). 4 indexed citations

17.

Nackerud, Shane, et al.. (2008). Blogging in the academy. New Directions for Student Services. 2008(124). 71–87. 15 indexed citations

18.

Nackerud, Shane, et al.. (2001). Do You Have the Right Stuff?. Internet Reference Services Quarterly. 6(1). 13–38. 10 indexed citations

19.

Nackerud, Shane. (1998). The Potential of CGI: Using Pre-Built CGI Scripts to Make Interactive Web Pages.. 17(4). 222–228. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact