Scott Lamothe
Impact in
- Public Administration top 2%
- Public Policy and Administration Research
- Strategy and Management top 10%
- Public Procurement and Policy
- Public-Private Partnership Projects
Papers in
-
- Public Policy and Administration Research 9
-
- Public Procurement and Policy 2
- Public-Private Partnership Projects 2
- Co-authors
- Michel Lamothe (1 shared paper)Richard C. Feiock (1 shared paper)Elizabeth Bell (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The American Review of Public Administration (4 papers)Public Administration Review (2 papers)Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory (2 papers)Urban Affairs Review (2 papers)International Journal of Public Administration (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Scott Lamothe
16 papers receiving 301 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
- Public Administration 164
- Strategy and Management 142
- Management Information Systems 52
- Political Science and International Relations 85
- Economics and Econometrics 98
Countries citing papers authored by Scott Lamothe
This map shows the geographic impact of Scott Lamothe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott Lamothe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott Lamothe more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Scott Lamothe
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott Lamothe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott Lamothe. The network helps show where Scott Lamothe may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 3 scholars most cited alongside Scott Lamothe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2008 | 75 | |
| 2 | 2011 | 57 | |
| 3 | 2009 | 42 | |
| 4 | 2008 | 39 | |
| 5 | 2012 | 26 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 20 | |
| 7 | 2006 | 17 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 14 | |
| 9 | 2015 | 12 | |
| 10 | 2005 | 5 | |
| 11 | 2015 | 4 | |
| 12 | Exploring the Determinants of Service Termination at the Local Level | 2012 | 3 |
| 13 | 2003 | 3 | |
| 14 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2012 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2004 | 1 |
About Scott Lamothe
Scott Lamothe is a scholar working on Public Administration, Strategy and Management, Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 16 papers that have together received 320 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Public Policy and Administration Research (9 papers), Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering (5 papers), Taxation and Compliance Studies (4 papers), Policy Transfer and Learning (3 papers), Outsourcing and Supply Chain Management (2 papers), Local Government Finance and Decentralization (2 papers), Public Procurement and Policy (2 papers) and Public-Private Partnership Projects (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (164 citations), Strategy and Management (142 citations), Management Information Systems (52 citations), Political Science and International Relations (85 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (98 citations). Scott Lamothe has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Michel Lamothe, Richard C. Feiock and Elizabeth Bell. Their work appears in journals such as The American Review of Public Administration, Public Administration Review, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Urban Affairs Review and International Journal of Public Administration.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.