Urban Affairs Review

1.2k papers and 31.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.2k papers published in Urban Affairs Review in the last decades have received a total of 31.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Urban Affairs Review usually cover Sociology and Political Science (628 papers), Political Science and International Relations (448 papers) and Economics and Econometrics (338 papers) specifically the topics of Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies (340 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (181 papers) and Housing Market and Economics (172 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Urban Affairs Review are Susan S. Fainstein, Jon Pierre, Robert J. Chaskin, Lance Freeman, Richard C. Feiock, Clarence N. Stone, Fulong Wu, Peter K. Eisinger, Jason Hackworth and Peter Marcuse.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Urban Affairs Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Urban Affairs Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Urban Affairs Review.

Countries where authors publish in Urban Affairs Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Urban Affairs Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Urban Affairs Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Urban Affairs Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025