Scott L. Decker

1.4k total citations
57 papers, 725 citations indexed

About

Scott L. Decker is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychiatry and Mental health. According to data from OpenAlex, Scott L. Decker has authored 57 papers receiving a total of 725 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 26 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 21 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 15 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health. Recurrent topics in Scott L. Decker's work include Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (13 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (13 papers) and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (12 papers). Scott L. Decker is often cited by papers focused on Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (13 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (13 papers) and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (12 papers). Scott L. Decker collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Peru. Scott L. Decker's co-authors include Raymond S. Dean, James B. Hale, Catherine Y. Chang, Danica G. Hays, Dawn P. Flanagan, Gary G. Brannigan, Diana L. Robins, W. Joel Schneider, Fredrick A. Schrank and Michael J. Beran and has published in prestigious journals such as NeuroImage, Frontiers in Psychology and Psychological Assessment.

In The Last Decade

Scott L. Decker

54 papers receiving 681 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Scott L. Decker United States 18 294 242 164 148 123 57 725
Ryan Honomichl United States 15 167 0.6× 346 1.4× 214 1.3× 232 1.6× 107 0.9× 35 889
W. Grant Willis United States 17 248 0.8× 272 1.1× 92 0.6× 183 1.2× 104 0.8× 30 726
Irene Rebollo Netherlands 15 191 0.6× 243 1.0× 464 2.8× 113 0.8× 125 1.0× 24 913
Nicholas Benson United States 17 479 1.6× 193 0.8× 391 2.4× 94 0.6× 203 1.7× 60 1.1k
Jodene Goldenring Fine United States 19 358 1.2× 338 1.4× 310 1.9× 291 2.0× 196 1.6× 30 1.0k
Lawrence G. Weiss United States 19 379 1.3× 188 0.8× 622 3.8× 199 1.3× 88 0.7× 43 1.1k
Monika Daseking Germany 16 253 0.9× 115 0.5× 229 1.4× 199 1.3× 128 1.0× 106 776
Catherine A. Fiorello United States 17 500 1.7× 182 0.8× 249 1.5× 154 1.0× 155 1.3× 30 844
Karl H. Wiedl Germany 16 367 1.2× 120 0.5× 216 1.3× 173 1.2× 82 0.7× 47 702
Deborah O. Day United States 5 436 1.5× 172 0.7× 240 1.5× 163 1.1× 201 1.6× 6 969

Countries citing papers authored by Scott L. Decker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott L. Decker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott L. Decker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott L. Decker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott L. Decker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott L. Decker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott L. Decker. The network helps show where Scott L. Decker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Scott L. Decker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Scott L. Decker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Scott L. Decker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Scott L. Decker. Scott L. Decker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Compton‐Lilly, Catherine, et al.. (2023). Stories Grounded in Decades of Research: What We Truly Know about the Teaching of Reading. The Reading Teacher. 77(3). 392–400. 11 indexed citations
2.
Decker, Scott L., et al.. (2023). Neurocognitive constructs as longitudinal predictors of reading fluency. Psychology in the Schools. 60(10). 3920–3946. 1 indexed citations
3.
Decker, Scott L., et al.. (2023). Translating research practices in the cognitive assessment of mild traumatic brain injury into applied practice: A systematic review and assessment guide.. Translational Issues in Psychological Science. 9(1). 6–24. 1 indexed citations
4.
Kruse, Jerrid, et al.. (2021). Exploring the STEM Landscape: Integrating the Natures of STEM into Elementary Earth Science.. Science and Children. 58(6). 30–37.
5.
Decker, Scott L., et al.. (2018). Bender‐Gestalt II differential item functioning across Caucasian and African American examinees. Psychology in the Schools. 56(1). 148–158.
6.
Decker, Scott L., et al.. (2016). Latent dimensions of executive functions in early childhood.. 2(3-4). 89–98. 9 indexed citations
7.
Dam, Wessel O. van, et al.. (2015). Resting state signatures of domain and demand-specific working memory performance. NeuroImage. 118. 174–182. 30 indexed citations
8.
Decker, Scott L., et al.. (2014). Development and Evaluation of an Online, Multicomponent Working Memory Battery. Assessment. 21(5). 543–561. 7 indexed citations
9.
Merino‐Soto, César, et al.. (2013). Test Gestáltico Visomotor de Bender – 2a versión. Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México). 12(2). 275–278. 1 indexed citations
10.
Beran, Michael J., et al.. (2012). Uncertainty Monitoring by Young Children in a Computerized Task. Scientifica. 2012. 1–6. 11 indexed citations
11.
Beran, Michael J., et al.. (2011). Monkeys (Macaca Mulatta and Cebus Apella) and Human Adults and Children (Homo Sapiens) Compare Subsets of Moving Stimuli Based on Numerosity. Frontiers in Psychology. 2. 61–61. 18 indexed citations
12.
Decker, Scott L., et al.. (2011). Cognitive and developmental influences in visual-motor integration skills in young children.. Psychological Assessment. 23(4). 1010–1016. 46 indexed citations
13.
Decker, Scott L.. (2010). Tactile measures in the structure of intelligence.. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale. 64(1). 53–59. 4 indexed citations
14.
Hale, James B., et al.. (2009). Development and validation of an attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) executive function and behavior rating screening battery. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology. 31(8). 897–912. 15 indexed citations
15.
Robins, Diana L., et al.. (2008). Autism Spectrum Disorders: Neurobiology and current assessment practices. Psychology in the Schools. 45(10). 905–917. 36 indexed citations
16.
Schmitt, Ara J. & Scott L. Decker. (2008). Test Reviews: Reynolds, C., & Voress, J. K. (2007). Test of Memory and Learning: Second Edition. Austin, TX: PRO-ED. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment. 27(2). 157–166. 5 indexed citations
17.
Decker, Scott L., et al.. (2008). Does a continuous measure of handedness predict reading processes and reading-related skills across the lifespan?. Laterality Asymmetries of Body Brain and Cognition. 13(6). 481–503. 6 indexed citations
18.
Decker, Scott L., et al.. (2007). EVIDENCE OF CONSTRUCT SIMILARITY IN EXECUTIVE FUNCTIONS AND FLUID REASONING ABILITIES. International Journal of Neuroscience. 117(6). 735–748. 50 indexed citations
19.
Decker, Scott L.. (2007). Measuring Growth and Decline in Visual-Motor Processes With the Bender-Gestalt Second Edition. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment. 26(1). 3–15. 21 indexed citations
20.
Brannigan, Gary G. & Scott L. Decker. (2006). The Bender-Gestalt II.. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry. 76(1). 10–12. 25 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026