Scott Freeman

16.4k total citations · 2 hit papers
80 papers, 9.8k citations indexed

About

Scott Freeman is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Education and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance. According to data from OpenAlex, Scott Freeman has authored 80 papers receiving a total of 9.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 24 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 23 papers in Education and 19 papers in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance. Recurrent topics in Scott Freeman's work include Economic theories and models (23 papers), Innovative Teaching Methods (18 papers) and Economic Theory and Policy (17 papers). Scott Freeman is often cited by papers focused on Economic theories and models (23 papers), Innovative Teaching Methods (18 papers) and Economic Theory and Policy (17 papers). Scott Freeman collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Switzerland. Scott Freeman's co-authors include Mary Pat Wenderoth, Sarah L. Eddy, Hannah Jordt, Michelle K. Smith, David C. Haak, Janneke HilleRisLambers, Wendy M. Jackson, Frank C. Rohwer, Eldredge Bermingham and Sievert Rohwer and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Science and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

In The Last Decade

Scott Freeman

78 papers receiving 9.1k citations

Hit Papers

Active learning increases student performance in science,... 2011 2026 2016 2021 2014 2011 1000 2.0k 3.0k 4.0k 5.0k

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Scott Freeman United States 35 5.6k 1.7k 1.4k 825 769 80 9.8k
Jan van Dijk Netherlands 51 2.2k 0.4× 2.1k 1.3× 306 0.2× 61 0.1× 874 1.1× 170 13.3k
Sarah L. Eddy United States 23 5.3k 1.0× 1.5k 0.9× 1.4k 1.0× 748 0.9× 65 0.1× 57 8.0k
Donna Haraway United States 44 2.1k 0.4× 146 0.1× 562 0.4× 93 0.1× 567 0.7× 105 28.4k
David N. Perkins United States 41 3.7k 0.7× 216 0.1× 2.9k 2.1× 245 0.3× 288 0.4× 96 14.0k
Wolff‐Michael Roth Canada 59 9.8k 1.7× 336 0.2× 5.9k 4.3× 143 0.2× 78 0.1× 548 15.7k
Paul Cobb United States 52 11.3k 2.0× 217 0.1× 5.0k 3.6× 65 0.1× 197 0.3× 162 14.5k
Mary Pat Wenderoth United States 24 5.8k 1.0× 1.6k 1.0× 1.5k 1.1× 893 1.1× 23 0.0× 56 8.3k
Cindy E. Hmelo‐Silver United States 39 7.5k 1.3× 955 0.6× 4.9k 3.5× 689 0.8× 41 0.1× 209 11.2k
Uri Wilensky United States 41 2.0k 0.4× 547 0.3× 2.8k 2.0× 116 0.1× 50 0.1× 185 7.1k
Jenny Knight United States 37 2.5k 0.4× 574 0.3× 863 0.6× 283 0.3× 182 0.2× 118 5.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Scott Freeman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott Freeman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott Freeman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott Freeman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott Freeman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott Freeman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott Freeman. The network helps show where Scott Freeman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Scott Freeman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Scott Freeman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Scott Freeman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Scott Freeman. Scott Freeman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Hennessey, Kelly M. & Scott Freeman. (2024). Nationally endorsed learning objectives to improve course design in introductory biology. PLoS ONE. 19(8). e0308545–e0308545. 6 indexed citations
2.
Theobald, Elli J., et al.. (2023). Measuring undergraduates’ understanding of the culture of scientific research as an outcome variable in research on CUREs. Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education. 24(3).
3.
Freeman, Scott, et al.. (2023). A CURE on the Evolution of Antibiotic Resistance in Escherichia coli Improves Student Conceptual Understanding. CBE—Life Sciences Education. 22(1). ar7–ar7. 3 indexed citations
4.
Harris, Rebecca B., Michael R. Mack, Jasmine R. Bryant, Elli J. Theobald, & Scott Freeman. (2020). Reducing achievement gaps in undergraduate general chemistry could lift underrepresented students into a “hyperpersistent zone”. Science Advances. 6(24). eaaz5687–eaaz5687. 129 indexed citations
5.
Casper, Anne M., Sarah L. Eddy, & Scott Freeman. (2019). True Grit: Passion and persistence make an innovative course design work. PLoS Biology. 17(7). e3000359–e3000359. 11 indexed citations
6.
Freeman, Scott & Adam R. Aron. (2015). Withholding a Reward-driven Action: Studies of the Rise and Fall of Motor Activation and the Effect of Cognitive Depletion. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 28(2). 237–251. 31 indexed citations
7.
Freeman, Scott, et al.. (2015). Suppressing a motivationally-triggered action tendency engages a response control mechanism that prevents future provocation. Neuropsychologia. 68. 218–231. 15 indexed citations
8.
Aminoff, Elissa, Scott Freeman, David Clewett, et al.. (2014). Maintaining a cautious state of mind during a recognition test: A large-scale fMRI study. Neuropsychologia. 67. 132–147. 16 indexed citations
9.
Freeman, Scott, et al.. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 111(23). 8410–8415. 5443 indexed citations breakdown →
10.
Aminoff, Elissa, David Clewett, Scott Freeman, et al.. (2012). Individual differences in shifting decision criterion: A recognition memory study. Memory & Cognition. 40(7). 1016–1030. 59 indexed citations
11.
Champ, Bruce, Scott Freeman, & Warren E. Weber. (1999). Redemption Costs and Interest Rates under the U.S. National Banking System. Journal of money credit and banking. 31(3). 568–568. 9 indexed citations
12.
Freeman, Scott. (1996). The Payments System, Liquidity, and Rediscounting. American Economic Review. 86(5). 1126–1138. 65 indexed citations
13.
Freeman, Scott & Joseph H. Haslag. (1995). Should Bank Reserves Earn Interest. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 25–33. 3 indexed citations
14.
Freeman, Scott & Robert M. Zink. (1995). A Phylogenetic Study of the Blackbirds Based on Variation in Mitochondrial DNA Restriction Sites. Systematic Biology. 44(3). 409–420. 49 indexed citations
15.
Champ, Bruce & Scott Freeman. (1994). Modeling monetary economics. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 4 indexed citations
16.
Freeman, Scott. (1992). Money and Output: Correlation or Causality?. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 1–7. 1 indexed citations
17.
Freeman, Scott & Gregory W. Huffman. (1991). Inside Money, Output, and Causality. International Economic Review. 32(3). 645–645. 25 indexed citations
18.
Champ, Bruce & Scott Freeman. (1990). Money, Output, and the Nominal National Debt. American Economic Review. 80(3). 390–397. 8 indexed citations
19.
Freeman, Scott. (1990). The evolution of the scrotum: A new hypothesis. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 145(4). 429–445. 44 indexed citations
20.
Freeman, Scott, et al.. (1990). Red-Winged Blackbirds and Brown-Headed Cowbirds: Some Aspects of a Host-Parasite Relationship. Ornithological Applications. 92(2). 336–336. 58 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026