Scott Freeman

1.2k citations
32 papers · 566 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Scott Freeman

28 papers receiving 478 citations

Peers

Scott Freeman
Comparison fields: 5 of 14
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 103
  • Economics and Econometrics 158
  • Finance 73
  • Sociology and Political Science 61
  • Safety Research 3
Replace Rubens Penha Cysne with:
Rubens Penha Cysne Brazil
Daniel Riera‐Crichton United States
Eran Yashiv Israel
Antonio Paradiso Italy
Antonio C. David United States
Gregory W. Huffman United States
Emmanouil Trachanas United Kingdom
Achim Truger Germany
Jalal Uddin Siddiki United Kingdom
Francesca G. Caselli United States
Scott Freeman relative to Rubens Penha Cysne Brazil Rubens Penha Cysne's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×
Rubens Penha Cysne · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Scott Freeman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott Freeman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott Freeman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott Freeman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott Freeman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott Freeman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott Freeman. The network helps show where Scott Freeman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Scott Freeman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Scott Freeman Line = papers co-authored together Scott Freeman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199690
2 199655
3 200055
4 199641
5 198839
6 198736
7 199926
8 199123
9 198522
10 198522
11 199918
12 200118
13 199916
14 199315
15 199212
16 198611
17 199111
18 19899
19 19999
20
Money, Output, and the Nominal National Debt
19908

About Scott Freeman

Scott Freeman is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Finance, Sociology and Political Science and Nuclear Energy and Engineering, having authored 32 papers that have together received 566 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Economic theories and models (13 papers), Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (5 papers), Banking stability, regulation, efficiency (2 papers), Economic Growth and Productivity (2 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (1 paper) and Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (103 citations), Economics and Econometrics (158 citations), Finance (73 citations), Sociology and Political Science (61 citations) and Safety Research (3 citations). Scott Freeman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Jeffrey T. Grogger, Jon C. Sonstelie, Finn E. Kydland, Bruce A. Champ, Gregory W. Huffman, Era Dabla‐Norris, Joseph H. Haslag, Stephen Polasky, Guido Tabellini and Dan Peled. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Monetary Economics, Journal of Political Economy, Review of Economic Dynamics, Journal of money credit and banking and Economic Theory.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact