Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Deepening Divide: Inequality in the Information Society
20051.3k citationsJan van DijkData Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)profile →
The relation between 21st-century skills and digital skills: A systematic literature review
20171.2k citationsEster van Laar, Alexander Johannes Aloysius Maria van Deursen et al.profile →
Digital divide research, achievements and shortcomings
This map shows the geographic impact of Jan van Dijk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jan van Dijk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jan van Dijk more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jan van Dijk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jan van Dijk. The network helps show where Jan van Dijk may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jan van Dijk
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jan van Dijk.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jan van Dijk based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Jan van Dijk. Jan van Dijk is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Laar, Ester van, Alexander Johannes Aloysius Maria van Deursen, Jan van Dijk, & Jos de Haan. (2020). Determinants of 21st-Century Skills and 21st-Century Digital Skills for Workers: A Systematic Literature Review. SAGE Open. 10(1).513 indexed citations breakdown →
Laar, Ester van, Alexander Johannes Aloysius Maria van Deursen, Jan van Dijk, & Jos de Haan. (2019). The sequential and conditional nature of 21st-century digital skills. International journal of communication. 13. 3462–3487.22 indexed citations
Deursen, Alexander Johannes Aloysius Maria van, et al.. (2018). Exploring the Internet Access of Indonesian SME Entrepreneurs. International Journal of Business. 23(3). 235–247.7 indexed citations
10.
Deursen, Alexander Johannes Aloysius Maria van, Jan van Dijk, & Oscar Peters. (2017). Habilidades digitales relacionadas con el medio y el contenido: la importancia del nivel educativo. 137–152.4 indexed citations
11.
Graaf, Maartje M.A. de, et al.. (2014). Long-term evaluation of a social robot in real homes. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).4 indexed citations
Dijk, Jan van & Kenneth L. Hacker. (2003). The Digital Divide as a Complex and Dynamic Phenomenon. The Information Society. 19(4). 315–326.960 indexed citations breakdown →
Steen, Hanno, Jan van Dijk, P.N. de Groot, & E. Kanis. (1989). Effects of recombinant porcine somatotropin on growth and carcass traits in Meishan pigs.. Journal of Animal Science. 67. 79–79.
Dijk, Jan van, et al.. (1962). XVIII. vorläufiger Bericht über die von dem Deutschen Archäologischen Institut und der Deutschen Orient-Gesellschaft aus Mitteln der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft unternommenen Ausgrabungen in Uruk-Warka, Winter 1959/60.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.