Scott Cole

405 citations
23 papers · 260 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Scott Cole

21 papers receiving 243 citations

Peers

Scott Cole
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 70
  • Ecology 94
  • Global and Planetary Change 68
  • Oceanography 34
  • Economics and Econometrics 40
Replace Denis Worlanyo Aheto with:
Denis Worlanyo Aheto Ghana
Taylor Gorham United Kingdom
Concillia Monde Zambia
Miriam Huitric Sweden
Kimberley H. Maxwell New Zealand
Sophia Kochalski Germany
Florian Schwarzmueller Germany
Sónia Seixas Portugal
Confred G. Musuka Zambia
Promode Kant China
Scott Cole relative to Denis Worlanyo Aheto Ghana Denis Worlanyo Aheto's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.8×
Denis Worlanyo Aheto · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Scott Cole

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott Cole's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott Cole with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott Cole more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott Cole

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott Cole. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott Cole. The network helps show where Scott Cole may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Scott Cole, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Scott Cole Line = papers co-authored together Scott Cole links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201079
2 201647
3 201121
4 199920
5 202120
6 201316
7 201310
8 201410
9 20165
10
Handbok för restaurering av ålgräs i Sverige : Vägledning
20165
11 20174
12
A Laminated Shaly Sand Work Flow: A Standardised Approach For The Carnarvon Basin Western Australia
20104
13 20114
14 20223
15 20223
16 20062
17 20212
18 20151
19 20111
20 20181

About Scott Cole

Scott Cole is a scholar working on Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change, Sociology and Political Science and Ecology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 260 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Economic and Environmental Valuation (10 papers), Environmental Conservation and Management (9 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (5 papers), Arctic and Russian Policy Studies (2 papers), International Environmental Law and Policies (2 papers), Global Energy and Sustainability Research (2 papers), Coastal and Marine Management (2 papers) and Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (70 citations), Ecology (94 citations), Global and Planetary Change (68 citations), Oceanography (34 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (40 citations). Scott Cole has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Per‐Olav Moksnes, Thomas Zabel, Alexander F. Koeppel, Alejandro P. Rooney, Danny Kriz̧anc, Frederick M. Cohan, Johannes Sikorski, Nicholas C. Field, Nora Connor and Elizabeth B. Perry. Their work appears in journals such as Restoration Ecology, Journal of Environmental Management, Land Use Policy, Frontiers in Marine Science and Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact