Catherine Loveday
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Behavioral Neuroscience top 2%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Martin A. ConwayAngela ClowFrank HucklebridgeAndrea OskisLisa ThornPhil EvansScott ColeZoë Pounder
- Topics
- Memory Processes and Influences (10 papers)Stress Responses and Cortisol (9 papers)Identity, Memory, and Therapy (9 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONEJournal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesItaly
In The Last Decade
Catherine Loveday
41 papers receiving 928 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
- Cognitive Neuroscience 363
- Behavioral Neuroscience 232
- Social Psychology 223
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 194
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 171
Countries citing papers authored by Catherine Loveday
This map shows the geographic impact of Catherine Loveday's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Catherine Loveday with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Catherine Loveday more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Catherine Loveday
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Catherine Loveday. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Catherine Loveday. The network helps show where Catherine Loveday may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Catherine Loveday
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Catherine Loveday. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Catherine Loveday based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Catherine Loveday. Catherine Loveday is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 67 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 9 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 20 | |
| 11 | 88 | |
| 12 | 9 | |
| 13 | 24 | |
| 14 | 53 | |
| 15 | 66 | |
| 16 | 45 | |
| 17 | 32 | |
| 18 | 90 | |
| 19 | 50 | |
| 20 | 9 |
About Catherine Loveday
Catherine Loveday is a scholar working on Behavioral Neuroscience, Music and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 42 papers that have together received 956 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Memory Processes and Influences (10 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (9 papers) and Identity, Memory, and Therapy (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (232 citations), Music (65 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (363 citations). Catherine Loveday has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Martin A. Conway, Angela Clow, Frank Hucklebridge, Andrea Oskis, Lisa Thorn, Phil Evans, Scott Cole, Zoë Pounder, Juha Silvanto and Alison F. Eardley. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.