Scott C. Smith
Impact in
- Horticulture top 10%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Epilepsy research and treatment
Papers in
-
- DNA Repair Mechanisms 4
- RNA Research and Splicing 2
- Genetics 5
- Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment 3
- Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders 2
- Co-authors
- Ingrid E. Scheffer (1 shared paper)Mary Connolly (1 shared paper)K Farrell (1 shared paper)Lynette G. Sadleir (1 shared paper)Michal Hetman (7 shared papers)Cynthia Gomes (2 shared papers)Theo Hagg (2 shared papers)Jing‐Juan Zheng (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Molecular Diagnostics (2 papers)Molecular Neurobiology (2 papers)The FASEB Journal (1 paper)Neurology (1 paper)Genes Chromosomes and Cancer (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Scott C. Smith
21 papers receiving 355 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Horticulture 16
- Psychiatry and Mental health 76
- Biochemistry 39
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 66
- Biological Psychiatry 8
Countries citing papers authored by Scott C. Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of Scott C. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott C. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott C. Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Scott C. Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott C. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott C. Smith. The network helps show where Scott C. Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Scott C. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2006 | 128 | |
| 2 | 2010 | 46 | |
| 3 | 2011 | 46 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 32 | |
| 5 | 2011 | 21 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 15 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 11 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 10 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 9 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 8 | |
| 11 | 2011 | 8 | |
| 12 | 2019 | 5 | |
| 13 | 2022 | 5 | |
| 14 | 2020 | 4 | |
| 15 | 2020 | 4 | |
| 16 | 2020 | 2 | |
| 17 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 18 | Young people who engage in child sexual exploitation behaviours : an exploratory study. | 2018 | 1 |
| 19 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2011 | 1 |
About Scott C. Smith
Scott C. Smith is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Genetics, Genetics, Neurology and Hematology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 360 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include DNA Repair Mechanisms (4 papers), Neuroblastoma Research and Treatments (3 papers), Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (2 papers), Microtubule and mitosis dynamics (2 papers), Cancer-related Molecular Pathways (2 papers), Education Discipline and Inequality (2 papers) and RNA Research and Splicing (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Horticulture (16 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (76 citations), Biochemistry (39 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (66 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (8 citations). Scott C. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Ingrid E. Scheffer, Mary Connolly, K Farrell, Lynette G. Sadleir, Michal Hetman, Cynthia Gomes, Theo Hagg, Jing‐Juan Zheng, Pierre Champy and Irene Litvan. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Molecular Diagnostics, Molecular Neurobiology, The FASEB Journal, Neurology and Genes Chromosomes and Cancer.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.