Scott A. Stanfield

756 citations
36 papers · 634 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Scott A. Stanfield

36 papers receiving 612 citations

Peers

Scott A. Stanfield
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • Applied Mathematics 230
  • Computational Mechanics 437
  • Aerospace Engineering 326
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 88
  • Bioengineering 17
Replace Alec W. Houpt with:
Alec W. Houpt United States
G. Burton Northam United States
Mario Carbonaro Belgium
Walter Lempert United States
B. Z. Cybyk United States
Robert D. Rockwell United States
Lance Jacobsen United States
Eric Matlis United States
Elmer John Felderman United States
Pavel K. Tretyakov Russia
Scott A. Stanfield relative to Alec W. Houpt United States Alec W. Houpt's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×12.7×
Alec W. Houpt · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Scott A. Stanfield

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott A. Stanfield's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott A. Stanfield with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott A. Stanfield more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott A. Stanfield

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott A. Stanfield. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott A. Stanfield. The network helps show where Scott A. Stanfield may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Scott A. Stanfield, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Scott A. Stanfield Line = papers co-authored together Scott A. Stanfield links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201568
2 201460
3 201254
4 200949
5 201242
6 201334
7 201534
8 201131
9 200626
10 201824
11 201920
12 201219
13 201118
14 200615
15 201215
16 201715
17 201210
18 201710
19 20069
20 20168

About Scott A. Stanfield

Scott A. Stanfield is a scholar working on Computational Mechanics, Applied Mathematics, Aerospace Engineering, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Atmospheric Science, having authored 36 papers that have together received 634 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows (16 papers), Plasma and Flow Control in Aerodynamics (15 papers), Gas Dynamics and Kinetic Theory (12 papers), Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics (10 papers), Plasma Applications and Diagnostics (10 papers), Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (6 papers), Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations (4 papers) and Heat Transfer Mechanisms (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Mathematics (230 citations), Computational Mechanics (437 citations), Aerospace Engineering (326 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (88 citations) and Bioengineering (17 citations). Scott A. Stanfield has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Roger L. Kimmel, Matthew P. Borg, David Adamczak, James A. Menart, James R. Hayes, Jonathan Poggie, Nicholas J. Bisek, Thomas J. Juliano, Charles A. DeJoseph and Jim W. Crafton. Their work appears in journals such as AIAA Journal, Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, Applied Physics Letters and Progress in Aerospace Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact