Nicholas J. Bisek
- Computational Mechanics top 2%
- Aerospace Engineering top 2%
- Applied Mathematics top 2%
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
- Co-authors
- Jonathan PoggieRyan GosseIain D. BoydIgor AdamovichMunetake NishiharaDonald P. RizzettaManinder S. GroverPaolo Valentini
- Topics
- Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics (51 papers)Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows (44 papers)Gas Dynamics and Kinetic Theory (34 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomSouth Korea
In The Last Decade
Nicholas J. Bisek
75 papers receiving 805 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
- Computational Mechanics 624
- Aerospace Engineering 531
- Applied Mathematics 257
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 105
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 100
Countries citing papers authored by Nicholas J. Bisek
This map shows the geographic impact of Nicholas J. Bisek's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicholas J. Bisek with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicholas J. Bisek more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nicholas J. Bisek
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicholas J. Bisek. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicholas J. Bisek. The network helps show where Nicholas J. Bisek may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nicholas J. Bisek
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nicholas J. Bisek. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nicholas J. Bisek based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nicholas J. Bisek. Nicholas J. Bisek is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 9 | |
| 11 | 12 | |
| 12 | 18 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 6 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 0 | |
| 17 | 5 | |
| 18 | 106 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | 3 |
About Nicholas J. Bisek
Nicholas J. Bisek is a scholar working on Applied Mathematics, Computational Mechanics and Aerospace Engineering, having authored 84 papers that have together received 840 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics (51 papers), Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows (44 papers) and Gas Dynamics and Kinetic Theory (34 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Mechanics (624 citations), Applied Mathematics (257 citations) and Aerospace Engineering (531 citations). Nicholas J. Bisek has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Jonathan Poggie, Ryan Gosse, Iain D. Boyd, Igor Adamovich, Munetake Nishihara, Donald P. Rizzetta, Maninder S. Grover, Paolo Valentini, Roger L. Kimmel and Scott Stanfield. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Science Advances and Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.