S.C. Chhabra
- Plant Science top 2%
- Molecular Biology
- Food Science top 2%
- Pharmacology top 0.5%
- Biochemistry top 2%
- Co-authors
- E.N. MshiuR.L.A. MahunnahCaroline Langat‐ThoruwaFebronia C. UisoBaldip KhanE.N.M. NjagiSabah A. OmarWilson Njue
- Topics
- Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies (18 papers)African Botany and Ecology Studies (10 papers)Insect Pest Control Strategies (9 papers)
- Cited by
- PharmacologyForestryBiochemistry
In The Last Decade
S.C. Chhabra
62 papers receiving 1.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
- Plant Science 1.3k
- Molecular Biology 490
- Food Science 432
- Pharmacology 422
- Biochemistry 267
Countries citing papers authored by S.C. Chhabra
This map shows the geographic impact of S.C. Chhabra's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by S.C. Chhabra with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites S.C. Chhabra more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by S.C. Chhabra
This network shows the impact of papers produced by S.C. Chhabra. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by S.C. Chhabra. The network helps show where S.C. Chhabra may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of S.C. Chhabra
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of S.C. Chhabra. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of S.C. Chhabra based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with S.C. Chhabra. S.C. Chhabra is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 27 | |
| 2 | 60 | |
| 3 | 50 | |
| 4 | 52 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 50 | |
| 7 | 66 | |
| 8 | 35 | |
| 9 | 31 | |
| 10 | 55 | |
| 11 | 78 | |
| 12 | 12 | |
| 13 | 173 | |
| 14 | Isolation, identification and bioassay of repellent factors in the essential oil of pyrethrum for grain protection against Sitophilus zeamais (Molts.). | 8 |
| 15 | 26 | |
| 16 | 82 | |
| 17 | 52 | |
| 18 | A survey of the medicinal plants of eastern Tanzania for alkaloids, flavonoids, saponins and tannins. | 21 |
| 19 | 6 | |
| 20 | An addition to the tetranychoid mite fauna of the Punjab, India. | 1 |
About S.C. Chhabra
S.C. Chhabra is a scholar working on Forestry, Pharmacology and Plant Science, having authored 63 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies (18 papers), African Botany and Ecology Studies (10 papers) and Insect Pest Control Strategies (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (422 citations), Forestry (192 citations) and Biochemistry (267 citations). S.C. Chhabra has collaborated with scholars based in Kenya, Germany and Tanzania. Frequent co-authors include E.N. Mshiu, R.L.A. Mahunnah, Caroline Langat‐Thoruwa, Febronia C. Uiso, Baldip Khan, E.N.M. Njagi, Sabah A. Omar, Wilson Njue, Alex K. Machocho and Mary Ndung’u. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Ethnopharmacology, Phytochemistry and Environmental Science and Pollution Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.