Sarah Williams

2.3k total citations
20 papers, 346 citations indexed

About

Sarah Williams is a scholar working on Infectious Diseases, Oncology and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Sarah Williams has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 346 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Infectious Diseases, 5 papers in Oncology and 4 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in Sarah Williams's work include Protein Structure and Dynamics (2 papers), Muscle metabolism and nutrition (2 papers) and Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (2 papers). Sarah Williams is often cited by papers focused on Protein Structure and Dynamics (2 papers), Muscle metabolism and nutrition (2 papers) and Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (2 papers). Sarah Williams collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Sarah Williams's co-authors include Erik S. Knudsen, Michael Markey, Steven P. Angus, Ranjaka W. Gunawardena, Bruce J. Aronow, Matthew W. Strobeck, Peter J. Maddison, Louise Lexis, Jeff S. Coombes and Natalie Strobel and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and The American Journal of Cardiology.

In The Last Decade

Sarah Williams

18 papers receiving 335 citations

Peers

Sarah Williams
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Molecular Biology 144
  • Oncology 111
  • Cell Biology 58
  • Epidemiology 32
  • Rheumatology 31
Replace Leonid M. Kanevskiy with:
Leonid M. Kanevskiy Russia
Virginia Lotti Italy
Sarah Becker Belgium
Besma Bel Hadj Jrad Tunisia
Sören Bruhn Sweden
Andreas Koenig United States
George Lominadze United States
Hongxiang Sun China
B. E. Wenzel Germany
Taiming Li China
Leonid M. Kanevskiy Russia View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Sarah Williams
Sarah Williams · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Sarah Williams
Sarah Williams · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Williams. The network helps show where Sarah Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sarah Williams

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sarah Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sarah Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sarah Williams. Sarah Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 3
2 0
3 1
4 9
5 0
6 1
7 11
8 8
9 36
10 41
11 12
12 32
13 28
14 5
15 31
16
Unbiased analysis of RB-mediated transcriptional repression identifies novel targets and distinctions from E2F action.
99
17
Who comes to skin checks?
11
18
The recognition and management of melanoma and other skin lesions by general practitioners in New Zealand.
11
19 6
20 1

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026