Sarah Kember
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Social Psychology
- Safety Research top 5%
- Geography, Planning and Development top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Co-authors
- Joanna ŻylińskaCelia LuryMariam FraserKerstin DautenhahnLilian EdwardsPaul NewmanJoanna J. BrysonGeoff Pegman
- Topics
- Digital Games and Media (5 papers)Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (4 papers)Posthumanist Ethics and Activism (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomItalyCanada
In The Last Decade
Sarah Kember
30 papers receiving 463 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
- Sociology and Political Science 182
- Social Psychology 76
- Safety Research 73
- Geography, Planning and Development 73
- Cognitive Neuroscience 70
Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Kember
This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Kember's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Kember with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Kember more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Kember
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Kember. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Kember. The network helps show where Sarah Kember may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sarah Kember
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sarah Kember. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sarah Kember based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sarah Kember. Sarah Kember is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 113 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 11 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 30 | |
| 8 | 115 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | Astrobiology and the Search For Life on Mars | 2 |
| 11 | ‘Creative Media between Invention and Critique, or What’s Still at Stake in Performativity’ | 3 |
| 12 | MEDIA, MARS AND METAMORPHOSIS | 2 |
| 13 | 23 | |
| 14 | ‘Creative Evolution? The quest for life (on Mars)’ | 2 |
| 15 | Inventive Life: Approaches Towards a New Vitalism | 4 |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 69 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | Virtual Anxiety: Photography, New Technologies and Subjectivity | 32 |
| 20 | 12 |
About Sarah Kember
Sarah Kember is a scholar working on Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Computer Science Applications and Cultural Studies, having authored 33 papers that have together received 581 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Games and Media (5 papers), Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (4 papers) and Posthumanist Ethics and Activism (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geography, Planning and Development (73 citations), Museology (41 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (51 citations). Sarah Kember has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Joanna Żylińska, Celia Lury, Mariam Fraser, Kerstin Dautenhahn, Lilian Edwards, Paul Newman, Joanna J. Bryson, Geoff Pegman, Mick Wallis and Blay Whitby. Their work appears in journals such as Theory Culture & Society, Economy and Society and Connection Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.