Ken Hillis
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Communication top 10%
- Gender Studies top 10%
- Human-Computer Interaction top 5%
- Geography, Planning and Development top 5%
- Co-authors
- Michaël PetitSusanna PaasonenKylie Jarrett
- Topics
- Digital Games and Media (5 papers)Cinema and Media Studies (2 papers)Digital Media and Philosophy (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Ken Hillis
24 papers receiving 365 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
- Sociology and Political Science 210
- Communication 76
- Gender Studies 73
- Human-Computer Interaction 67
- Geography, Planning and Development 52
Countries citing papers authored by Ken Hillis
This map shows the geographic impact of Ken Hillis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ken Hillis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ken Hillis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ken Hillis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ken Hillis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ken Hillis. The network helps show where Ken Hillis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ken Hillis
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ken Hillis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ken Hillis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ken Hillis. Ken Hillis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | A Midsummer's Bonfire: Affective Intensities of Online Debate | 12 |
| 2 | “Let's Express Our Friendship by Sending Each Other Funny Links instead of Actually Talking”: Gifts, Commodities, and Social Reproduction in Facebook | 2 |
| 3 | Queer Reverb: Tumblr, Affect, Time | 13 |
| 4 | Sensation, Networks, and the GIF: Toward an Allotropic Account of Affect | 6 |
| 5 | Accumulating Affect: Social Networks and Their Archives of Feelings | 0 |
| 6 | Ethologies of Software Art and Affect: What Can a Digital Body of Code Do? | 3 |
| 7 | 56 | |
| 8 | 25 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 0 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | Spatial Technologies for the Mobile Class: Life in the 'Cooltown' Ecosystem | 2 |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 88 | |
| 16 | Digital Sensations: Space, Identity, and Embodiment in Virtual Reality | 101 |
| 17 | 56 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 7 | |
| 20 | 4 |
About Ken Hillis
Ken Hillis is a scholar working on Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Geography, Planning and Development and Music, having authored 26 papers that have together received 455 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Games and Media (5 papers), Cinema and Media Studies (2 papers) and Digital Media and Philosophy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (67 citations), Communication (76 citations) and Geography, Planning and Development (52 citations). Ken Hillis has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Michaël Petit, Susanna Paasonen and Kylie Jarrett. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Sociology, Progress in Human Geography and City.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.