Sarah Howlett
About
In The Last Decade
Sarah Howlett
6 papers receiving 515 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 352
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 217
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 188
- Psychiatry and Mental health 133
- Sociology and Political Science 127
Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Howlett
This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Howlett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Howlett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Howlett more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Howlett
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Howlett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Howlett. The network helps show where Sarah Howlett may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sarah Howlett
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sarah Howlett. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sarah Howlett based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sarah Howlett. Sarah Howlett is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 14 | |
| 2 | 127 | |
| 3 | 26 | |
| 4 | 30 | |
| 5 | 25 | |
| 6 | 314 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.