Sarah E. Kemp

12 papers receiving 611 citations

Peers

Sarah E. Kemp
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Sensory Systems 368
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 293
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 192
  • Social Psychology 199
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 8
Replace Bénédicte Le Calvé with:
Bénédicte Le Calvé Switzerland
B. G. Green United States
Maria A. A. P. da Silva Brazil
Michael D. Rabin United States
Barry Smith United Kingdom
Caroline Bushdid United States
Elodie Le Berre France
Fabiana M. Carvalho Brazil
Arnaud Fournel France
Hiroaki Nagasaki Japan
Sarah E. Kemp relative to Bénédicte Le Calvé Switzerland Bénédicte Le Calvé's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Bénédicte Le Calvé · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah E. Kemp

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah E. Kemp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah E. Kemp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah E. Kemp more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah E. Kemp

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah E. Kemp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah E. Kemp. The network helps show where Sarah E. Kemp may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Sarah E. Kemp, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sarah E. Kemp Line = papers co-authored together Sarah E. Kemp links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 1996156
2 199792
3 199789
4
Olfactory and visual mental imagery.
199872
5 199470
6 198956
7 201529
8 199625
9 200819
10 199218
11 20166
12
Comparison of Functional Electrical Stimulation and Ankle-Foot Orthosis to Improve Gait Quality in a Patient with Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: A Case Report
20181
13 20230

About Sarah E. Kemp

Sarah E. Kemp is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Biomedical Engineering, Nutrition and Dietetics, Social Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 633 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (6 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (5 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (4 papers), Color perception and design (2 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (2 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (1 paper), Meat and Animal Product Quality (1 paper) and Breast Implant and Reconstruction (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (368 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (293 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (192 citations), Social Psychology (199 citations) and Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (8 citations). Sarah E. Kemp has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Avery N. Gilbert, Robyn Martin, G. G. Birch, Gary K. Beauchamp, Melissa Crouch, Andrew C. Nelson, Mariya Farooqui, Kathryn L. Schwertfeger, Laura R. Bohrer and Pavlina Chuntova. Their work appears in journals such as Chemical Senses, Psychological Science, Genes & Cancer, International Journal of Food Science & Technology and ANZ Journal of Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact