Richard Cheston
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 2%
- General Health Professions top 2%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Co-authors
- Michael BenderGary ChristopherJane GilliardKelvyn JonesEmily DoddPaul WhiteKate GleesonSarah Cullum
- Topics
- Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (26 papers)Psychiatric care and mental health services (13 papers)Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (12 papers)
- Cited by
- Neuropsychology and Physiological PsychologyPsychiatry and Mental healthGeneral Health Professions
- Partner nations
- United KingdomNew ZealandQatar
In The Last Decade
Richard Cheston
70 papers receiving 1.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
- Psychiatry and Mental health 539
- General Health Professions 479
- Clinical Psychology 301
- Social Psychology 246
- Sociology and Political Science 209
Countries citing papers authored by Richard Cheston
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Cheston's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Cheston with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Cheston more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Cheston
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Cheston. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Cheston. The network helps show where Richard Cheston may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard Cheston
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard Cheston. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard Cheston based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard Cheston. Richard Cheston is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 11 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 12 | |
| 10 | 0 | |
| 11 | 0 | |
| 12 | 27 | |
| 13 | 9 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 36 | |
| 16 | 14 | |
| 17 | 52 | |
| 18 | 27 | |
| 19 | 50 | |
| 20 | 43 |
About Richard Cheston
Richard Cheston is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Clinical Psychology, having authored 77 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (26 papers), Psychiatric care and mental health services (13 papers) and Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (79 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (539 citations) and General Health Professions (479 citations). Richard Cheston has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, New Zealand and Qatar. Frequent co-authors include Michael Bender, Gary Christopher, Jane Gilliard, Kelvyn Jones, Emily Dodd, Paul White, Kate Gleeson, Sarah Cullum, Roy Jones and Alex Stephens. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Alzheimer s Disease, BMJ Open and BMC Health Services Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.