Sarah C. Baxter
- Materials Chemistry top 5%
- Biomedical Engineering top 2%
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials top 2%
- Molecular Biology
- Biomaterials top 2%
- Co-authors
- Edie C. GoldsmithCatherine J. MurphyPatrick N. SiscoJohn W. StoneAnand GoleAlaaldin M. AlkilanyKen D. ShimizuYizhao Chen
- Topics
- Composite Material Mechanics (19 papers)Mechanical Behavior of Composites (7 papers)Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaIran
In The Last Decade
Sarah C. Baxter
48 papers receiving 3.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 148
- Materials Chemistry 1.1k
- Biomedical Engineering 1.0k
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 891
- Molecular Biology 536
- Biomaterials 518
Countries citing papers authored by Sarah C. Baxter
This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah C. Baxter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah C. Baxter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah C. Baxter more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah C. Baxter
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah C. Baxter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah C. Baxter. The network helps show where Sarah C. Baxter may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sarah C. Baxter
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sarah C. Baxter. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sarah C. Baxter based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sarah C. Baxter. Sarah C. Baxter is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 26 | |
| 5 | 14 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 39 | |
| 10 | 9 | |
| 11 | 33 | |
| 12 | 39 | |
| 13 | Gold Nanoparticles in Biology: Beyond Toxicity to Cellular Imagingbreakdown → | 1498 |
| 14 | 87 | |
| 15 | 8 | |
| 16 | 36 | |
| 17 | 5 | |
| 18 | 476 | |
| 19 | 35 | |
| 20 | 85 |
About Sarah C. Baxter
Sarah C. Baxter is a scholar working on Architecture, Mechanics of Materials and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, having authored 54 papers that have together received 3.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Composite Material Mechanics (19 papers), Mechanical Behavior of Composites (7 papers) and Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (891 citations), Analytical Chemistry (456 citations) and Biomaterials (518 citations). Sarah C. Baxter has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Iran. Frequent co-authors include Edie C. Goldsmith, Catherine J. Murphy, Patrick N. Sisco, John W. Stone, Anand Gole, Alaaldin M. Alkilany, Ken D. Shimizu, Yizhao Chen, Christopher T. Robinson and Cornelius O. Horgan. Their work appears in journals such as Nano Letters, Accounts of Chemical Research and Analytical Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.