Sarah Burke
- Genetics
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Karen M. CollinsMaggie KirkPeter FarndonHelena D. Cooper–ThomasHywel ThomasAnna StoneJulie BedwardBenzi M. Kluger
- Topics
- BRCA gene mutations in cancer (7 papers)Genomics and Rare Diseases (6 papers)Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesSweden
In The Last Decade
Sarah Burke
26 papers receiving 557 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
- Genetics 146
- Gender Studies 133
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 109
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 76
- Sociology and Political Science 75
Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Burke
This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Burke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Burke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Burke more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Burke
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Burke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Burke. The network helps show where Sarah Burke may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sarah Burke
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sarah Burke. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sarah Burke based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sarah Burke. Sarah Burke is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 24 | |
| 6 | 29 | |
| 7 | 26 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 13 | |
| 10 | 13 | |
| 11 | 21 | |
| 12 | 14 | |
| 13 | 25 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 20 | |
| 16 | Dietitians' views of the importance of genetics to dietetic practice: the impact of education | 3 |
| 17 | 39 | |
| 18 | 9 | |
| 19 | 41 | |
| 20 | 3 |
About Sarah Burke
Sarah Burke is a scholar working on Issues, ethics and legal aspects, Health Information Management and Genetics, having authored 27 papers that have together received 605 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include BRCA gene mutations in cancer (7 papers), Genomics and Rare Diseases (6 papers) and Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (133 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (109 citations) and Genetics (146 citations). Sarah Burke has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Karen M. Collins, Maggie Kirk, Peter Farndon, Helena D. Cooper–Thomas, Hywel Thomas, Anna Stone, Julie Bedward, Benzi M. Kluger, Mingzhou Ding and Melissa Martyn. Their work appears in journals such as Neurobiology of Aging, Journal of Advanced Nursing and BMC Health Services Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.