Anna Stone

766 total citations
38 papers, 431 citations indexed

About

Anna Stone is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Anna Stone has authored 38 papers receiving a total of 431 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 11 papers in Social Psychology and 6 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Anna Stone's work include Face Recognition and Perception (14 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (9 papers) and Deception detection and forensic psychology (6 papers). Anna Stone is often cited by papers focused on Face Recognition and Perception (14 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (9 papers) and Deception detection and forensic psychology (6 papers). Anna Stone collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and United States. Anna Stone's co-authors include Tim Valentine, Peter Farndon, Sarah Burke, Hywel Thomas, Janice M. Marshall, Edward J. Johns, Christopher C. French, Julie Bedward, R. Davis and Lara A. Frumkin and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Cognition and Personality and Individual Differences.

In The Last Decade

Anna Stone

35 papers receiving 409 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Anna Stone United Kingdom 14 164 86 63 60 59 38 431
Houcan Zhang China 12 167 1.0× 129 1.5× 68 1.1× 24 0.4× 32 0.5× 23 768
Laura Franchin Italy 14 193 1.2× 101 1.2× 126 2.0× 45 0.8× 13 0.2× 45 476
Tore M. Torjussen Norway 8 125 0.8× 328 3.8× 59 0.9× 115 1.9× 74 1.3× 9 654
Sabine Doebel United States 16 211 1.3× 192 2.2× 112 1.8× 51 0.8× 23 0.4× 23 818
Harry Purser United Kingdom 12 127 0.8× 86 1.0× 45 0.7× 17 0.3× 28 0.5× 26 458
Sarah Greene United States 9 83 0.5× 174 2.0× 66 1.0× 166 2.8× 11 0.2× 15 496
Carlos Gallego Spain 10 114 0.7× 33 0.4× 19 0.3× 45 0.8× 24 0.4× 34 501
Kathryn McCabe Australia 16 239 1.5× 88 1.0× 109 1.7× 68 1.1× 119 2.0× 24 875
Mary Bryden United Kingdom 9 222 1.4× 94 1.1× 41 0.7× 53 0.9× 13 0.2× 36 674
Benjamin Goldberg United States 11 74 0.5× 19 0.2× 104 1.7× 79 1.3× 90 1.5× 46 547

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Stone

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Stone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Stone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Stone more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Stone

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Stone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Stone. The network helps show where Anna Stone may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anna Stone

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anna Stone. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anna Stone based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anna Stone. Anna Stone is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Stone, Anna, et al.. (2025). The Risks of Being a Wallflower: Exploring Links Between Introversion, Aspects of Solitude, and Indices of Well-Being in Adolescence. Behavioral Sciences. 15(2). 108–108. 1 indexed citations
2.
Stone, Anna, et al.. (2024). The Development of Social Withdrawal Research in Childhood and Adolescence Over 70 Years: A Systematic Scoping Review. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly. 70(2). 189–217. 1 indexed citations
3.
Phillips, Katherine W., Jonathan Hazlehurst, Srikanth Bellary, et al.. (2023). Inequalities in the management of diabetic kidney disease in UK primary care: A cross‐sectional analysis of a large primary care database. Diabetic Medicine. 41(1). e15153–e15153. 5 indexed citations
4.
Pozzulo, Joanna, et al.. (2023). A Community Mental Health and Well-Being University Level Course: Design and Implementation. Journal of Experiential Education. 47(4). 704–722.
5.
Stone, Anna, et al.. (2022). Abuse in Sports: The Influence of Victim Gender, Defendant Gender, and Type of Abuse. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology. 40(2). 281–291.
6.
Frumkin, Lara A. & Anna Stone. (2020). Not all eyewitnesses are equal: Accent status, race and age interact to influence evaluations of testimony. Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice. 18(2). 123–145. 13 indexed citations
7.
Stone, Anna, et al.. (2017). Emotional responses to disfigured faces and Disgust Sensitivity: An eye-tracking study. Journal of Health Psychology. 24(9). 1191–1200. 21 indexed citations
8.
9.
Burke, Sarah, Melissa Martyn, Anna Stone, et al.. (2009). Developing a curriculum statement based on clinical practice: genetics in primary care. British Journal of General Practice. 59(559). 99–103. 25 indexed citations
10.
11.
Burke, Sarah, Anna Stone, Julie Bedward, Hywel Thomas, & Peter Farndon. (2006). A “neglected part of the curriculum” or “of limited use”? Views on genetics training by nongenetics medical trainees and implications for delivery. Genetics in Medicine. 8(2). 109–115. 39 indexed citations
12.
Stone, Anna & Tim Valentine. (2006). The categorical structure of knowledge for famous people (and a novel application of Centre-Surround theory)☆. Cognition. 104(3). 535–564. 17 indexed citations
13.
Stone, Anna & Tim Valentine. (2005). Strength of visual percept generated by famous faces perceived without awareness: Effects of affective valence, response latency, and visual field. Consciousness and Cognition. 14(3). 548–564. 14 indexed citations
14.
Stone, Anna & Tim Valentine. (2004). Accuracy of familiarity decisions to famous faces perceived without awareness depends on attitude to the target person and on response latency. Consciousness and Cognition. 14(2). 351–376. 3 indexed citations
15.
Stone, Anna & Tim Valentine. (2004). Better the devil you know? Nonconscious processing of identity and affect of famous faces. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 11(3). 469–474. 20 indexed citations
16.
Stone, Anna & Tim Valentine. (2003). Perspectives on Prosopagnosia and Models of Face Recognition. Cortex. 39(1). 31–40. 20 indexed citations
17.
Stone, Anna & Tim Valentine. (2003). Viewpoint: Perspectives on prosopagnosia and models of face recognition. UEL Research Repository (University of East London). 4 indexed citations
18.
Stone, Anna, Tim Valentine, & R. Davis. (2001). Face recognition and emotional valence: Processing without awareness by neurologically intact participants does not simulate covert recognition in prosopagnosia. Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience. 1(2). 183–191. 22 indexed citations
19.
Marshall, Janice M., Anna Stone, & Edward J. Johns. (1991). Analysis of the responses evoked in the cutaneous circulation of one hand by heating the contralateral hand. Journal of the Autonomic Nervous System. 32(2). 91–99. 7 indexed citations
20.
Marshall, Janice M., Anna Stone, & Edward J. Johns. (1990). Analysis of vascular responses evoked in the cutaneous circulation of one hand by cooling the contralateral hand. Journal of the Autonomic Nervous System. 31(1). 57–66. 19 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Houcan Zhang Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Laura Franchin Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Tore M. Torjussen Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sabine Doebel Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Harry Purser Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sarah Greene Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Carlos Gallego Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Kathryn McCabe Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Mary Bryden Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Benjamin Goldberg
Rankless by CCL
2026