Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Close encounters of the digital kind: A research agenda for the digitalization of public services
2019267 citationsIda Lindgren, Christian Østergaard Madsen et al.Government Information Quarterlyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Ida Lindgren's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ida Lindgren with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ida Lindgren more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ida Lindgren. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ida Lindgren. The network helps show where Ida Lindgren may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ida Lindgren
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ida Lindgren.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ida Lindgren based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Ida Lindgren. Ida Lindgren is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Hofmann, Sara, et al.. (2021). A citizen-centered analysis of what public services are suitable for digital communication channels. IT University Of Copenhagen (IT University of Copenhagen).1 indexed citations
10.
Johansson, Björn, et al.. (2020). Impacts of RPA on employees’ skill variety. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.4 indexed citations
11.
Lindgren, Ida, et al.. (2019). The Long and Winding Road of Digital Public Services—One Next Step: Proactivity. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.3 indexed citations
12.
Lindgren, Ida, Christian Østergaard Madsen, Sara Hofmann, & Ulf Melin. (2019). Close encounters of the digital kind: A research agenda for the digitalization of public services. Government Information Quarterly. 36(3). 427–436.267 indexed citations breakdown →
13.
Simonofski, Anthony, et al.. (2019). Towards a Decision Support Guide for User Participation in Public e-Service Development. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.1 indexed citations
14.
Melin, Ulf, et al.. (2018). Exploring User Participation Practice in Public E-Service Development : Why, How and in Whose Interest?. KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology). 16(1). 72–86.12 indexed citations
15.
Melin, Ulf & Ida Lindgren. (2017). Open Government Data in an e-service Context : Managerial and Conceptual Challenges, Completed Research Full Paper. Americas Conference on Information Systems.1 indexed citations
16.
Lindgren, Ida, et al.. (2017). Not another new wine in the same old bottles : Motivators and innovation in local government e-service development. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 691–702.3 indexed citations
17.
Melin, Ulf & Ida Lindgren. (2017). Open Government Data in an e-service Context - Managerial and Conceptual Challenges. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.1 indexed citations
18.
Schöll, H., Marijn Janssen, Bram Klievink, et al.. (2016). Proceedings of the 8th IFIP WG 8.5 International Conference, EGOV 2016. UNU Collections (United Nations University).4 indexed citations
19.
Smith, Kip & Ida Lindgren. (2010). Predicting group faultlines in multinational crisis response teams.. ISCRAM.
20.
Axelsson, Karin, Ulf Melin, & Ida Lindgren. (2009). Developing public e-services for several stakeholders a multifaceted view of the needs for an e-service. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 2804–2815.8 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.