Sara Abbott

457 citations
6 papers · 316 · h-index 4

Impact in

Papers in

Sara Abbott

4 papers receiving 306 citations

Peers

Sara Abbott
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Statistics and Probability 125
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 83
  • Sensory Systems 29
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 73
  • Developmental Neuroscience 16
Replace Dongnhu T. Truong with:
Dongnhu T. Truong United States
Christopher G. Fiondella United States
Thomas O’Reilly-Pol United States
Haiying Meng United States
Heidi Anthoni Sweden
Lisa A. Gabel United States
Tom S. Scerri United Kingdom
Martín Elías Costa Argentina
Andrea Citterio Italy
Jaana Nopola‐Hemmi Finland
Sara Abbott relative to Dongnhu T. Truong United States Dongnhu T. Truong's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Dongnhu T. Truong · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sara Abbott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sara Abbott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sara Abbott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sara Abbott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sara Abbott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sara Abbott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sara Abbott. The network helps show where Sara Abbott may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sara Abbott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sara Abbott Line = papers co-authored together Sara Abbott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

6 of 6 papers shown
#Work
1 2004137
2 2007131
3 200126
4 201822
5 20170
6 20240

About Sara Abbott

Sara Abbott is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Family Practice, Sociology and Political Science, Marketing and Oncology, having authored 6 papers that have together received 316 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (1 paper), Nerve injury and regeneration (1 paper), Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (1 paper), Marketing and Advertising Strategies (1 paper), Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (1 paper), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (1 paper), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (1 paper) and Child and Animal Learning Development (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics and Probability (125 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (83 citations), Sensory Systems (29 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (73 citations) and Developmental Neuroscience (16 citations). Sara Abbott has collaborated with scholars based in United States, India and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Elizabeth M. Brannon, Hiroshi Hasegawa, Bao-Xia Han, Fan Wang, Nigel Morgan, Annette Pritchard, P. Kelly Marcom, Smita K. Nair, Gloria Broadwater and Sarah Sammons. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, Cognition, Journal Of Vacation Marketing, International Journal of Gynecological Pathology and Clinical Breast Cancer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact