Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
What is food tourism?
2018406 citationsEerang Park, Sangkyun Kim et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Sangkyun Kim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sangkyun Kim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sangkyun Kim more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sangkyun Kim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sangkyun Kim. The network helps show where Sangkyun Kim may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sangkyun Kim
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sangkyun Kim.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sangkyun Kim based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Sangkyun Kim. Sangkyun Kim is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Kim, Sangkyun, et al.. (2017). The Effects of The Distinction in Family Business on CEO Succession Types: A Behavioral Agency Theory Perspective. 39(1). 1–39.2 indexed citations
Kim, Sangkyun, et al.. (2017). Film Tourism Town and Its Local Community. International Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Administration. 18(3). 334–360.13 indexed citations
Brown, Steve, et al.. (2012). An investigatory analysis of the main motivational dimensions of audiences at ethnic minority cultural festivals. 66.1 indexed citations
Jang, Hyunchul, et al.. (2009). Research Trend Analysis of Traditional Korean Medicine Supported by the Government - on the Research Reports from 2002 to 2007 Year -. 22(4). 15–28.
15.
Lee, Seung Eun, Dae Wook Hwang, Chang-Sup Lim, et al.. (2008). The Clinical Features and the Clinical Outcome of Duodenal Brunner’s Gland Adenoma. Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery. 12(4). 284–286.
16.
Kim, Sangkyun & Heung‐Gyoon Ryu. (2008). Co-ordinate interleaving in the OFDM system and performance improvement in fading channel. Asia-Pacific Conference on Communications. 1–5.1 indexed citations
17.
Kim, Sangkyun, et al.. (2006). The Impact of Celebrity-based motivations on Destination Image Formation Process. 18(1). 333–351.
18.
Kim, Dae Jung, Sangkyun Kim, Myung‐Hee Kim, Hee-Bong Lee, & Junsoo Lee. (2003). Analysis of trans-Resveratrol Contents of Grape and Grape Products Consumed in Korea. Korean Journal of Food Science and Technology. 35(5). 764–768.13 indexed citations
19.
Kim, Sangkyun, et al.. (2000). Effect of ZnCl 2 on Formation of Asymmetric PEI Membrane by Phase Inversion Process. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry. 6(2). 93–99.17 indexed citations
20.
Kim, Sangkyun, et al.. (1998). Preparation and Storage Conditions of Oleoresin from Root Portion of Peeled Garlic. Korean Journal of Food Science and Technology. 30(6). 1321–1326.4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.